Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think what most of those people were saying was not that a 4-team playoff would ruin the regular season. Rather, it was that a 4-team playoff (i) would diminish the importance of the regular season to a modest extent, and (ii) would not end up giving the proponents what they wanted in the long term (some kind of indisputable, or at least much fairer championship), so that it would naturally progress to 8 teams, then maybe more. Then the regular season would be like NCAA basketball. Point (i) I think is true. For example, Penn State's early season losses would have eliminated them in previous formats, now they hardly matter. But that's modest. Part (ii) remains to be seen, but we are seeing inklings in this very thread. Either way, you can certainly make the argument that the entertainment of the playoff outweighs whatever effects in has on the regular season.That is what was said, including by myself, about a 4 team playoff
I was obviously wrong, the regular seasons aren't ruined by any stretch.
Even at 8, a team isn't going to be able to lose but 1-2 games and still make the playoff.
I agree that it is reasonable to characterize the situation as being one where the amount of help that OSU needs to probably get into the playoff is not that great. To your second quoted point, that is indisputable.My scenario actually requires very few upsets...
The primary upsets that Ohio State has to worry about are being upset by Michigan State or Michigan.
You're right, but I think you're ending your analysis prematurely. Assuming OSU is ranked #2 tomorrow, and that they beat MSU and UM, they will almost certainly be ranked #2 at the end of the regular season. Unless PSU loses in the next 2 weeks, it is far less likely (I would say, very unlikely) that they will hold that ranking thereafter.Not sure how you can say that. If they put us at 2 this week, they're going to have to drop us for winning games the next two weeks, one of them against ZOMG PEPPERS!
I think where they put us on Tuesday will tell the whole OSU story for the rest of the way, assuming of course we win out.
I think we need to start looking at the field in the abstract and not just as OSU fans.
View attachment 14209
I just whipped this up off the current (about to change on Tuesday) CFP rankings. A "?" means it hasn't been played and it's my best guess as to opponent.
Biggest thing to remember to save some people stomach lining is that the Conf Champ thing is a tie breaker between teams of a similar record. What we do not know for sure is if they will jump a 2 loss team over a 1 loss team because of a conference championship.
So looking at the field here is my weakest to strongest
3 of those 5 have to get in
- Louisville
- 2 loss B1G champ
- Pac 12 Champ UW
- At Large OSU
- ACC Champ Clemson
EDIT
Penn State losses should read "at Pitt"
The last thing I want to do is make this political, but I think it is somewhat a question of how "federalist" the playoff committee's approach is. If they take the approach of "When all the games have been played, we will let each conference tell us who their "best" team is, and then make our selections accordingly." It doesn't necessarily mean that e.g. anyone really thinks Wisconsin is better than OSU; it means the conference gets to determine its champion, and that holds sway.I don't see an argument for Wisconsin over Ohio State if the Buckeyes beat Michigan...
In a weird twist, I think Wisconsin needs to hope that Michigan or Ohio State find a way into the CCG, as a win over Penn State in Indy probably isn't enough to punch their ticket.That said, if the BigTen CCG is Penn State vs. Wisconsin, a Wisconsin win would almost certainly be better for OSU's chances than a Penn State win would be. Even more so if by some strange turn it is Penn State vs. Nebraska.
Reading the committees directives makes one thing clear--if PSU and Wisconsin play in the title game we need to root for Wisconsin...it repeatedly states the importance of head-to-head.
No question. Anytime you're on the cusp, you want your CCG opponent to be the most highly-rated team possible. OSU was in a similar position in 2014, hoping that Wisconsin would take care of Minnesota, so that OSU could get a top-ten opponent. Wisconsin fans should probably be pulling for anyone to beat Penn State or, failing that, for Michigan to beat OSU.In a weird twist, I think Wisconsin needs to hope that Michigan or Ohio State find a way into the CCG, as a win over Penn State in Indy probably isn't enough to punch their ticket.
Right....but how, oh how my friend, could they possibly put in freaking P$U over us?? I mean, they lost to PITT!!!! And, scUM who, we could POSSIBLY beat (I am not taking anything for granted). Their strength of schedule is [Mark May]. We are the only ranked team they beat.
Wisky would be more likely, don't you think to get in, since they have similar signature wins (granted one is over an overrated LSU). Yes, we beat them. But in OT. I'm not sure we shouldn't be rooting for the Pedsters IF they get in. Overall, we need to root for ourselves to get past Sparty AND scUM (that has now had a wake-up call).
Yes, it was fun to watch scUM lose. But, I really wish they would've trounced Iowa and WE COULD'VE beat them.
They wouldn't hold the 2 spot, but it'd be pretty damn hard to defend moving us from 2 to 5 while winning out. There's more wiggle room for them to do their mental gymnastics this week to keep us out of the 2 spot if they don't want us there without winning the conference. Where they put us tomorrow tells me everything I need to know about how they truly feel about a non-conference winning but clearly top 4 team.I think what most of those people were saying was not that a 4-team playoff would ruin the regular season. Rather, it was that a 4-team playoff (i) would diminish the importance of the regular season to a modest extent, and (ii) would not end up giving the proponents what they wanted in the long term (some kind of indisputable, or at least much fairer championship), so that it would naturally progress to 8 teams, then maybe more. Then the regular season would be like NCAA basketball. Point (i) I think is true. For example, Penn State's early season losses would have eliminated them in previous formats, now they hardly matter. But that's modest. Part (ii) remains to be seen, but we are seeing inklings in this very thread. Either way, you can certainly make the argument that the entertainment of the playoff outweighs whatever effects in has on the regular season.
I agree that it is reasonable to characterize the situation as being one where the amount of help that OSU needs to probably get into the playoff is not that great. To your second quoted point, that is indisputable.
You're right, but I think you're ending your analysis prematurely. Assuming OSU is ranked #2 tomorrow, and that they beat MSU and UM, they will almost certainly be ranked #2 at the end of the regular season. Unless PSU loses in the next 2 weeks, it is far less likely (I would say, very unlikely) that they will hold that ranking thereafter.