College Football Playoff (2015-16 Season)

[UpNorth_Buckeye]

Those rankings are a joke. And I'm not even referring to OSU at 3. 4-6 are reprehensible imo. Bama at 4, ND at 5, Baylor at 6. Absolute joke.

 

[Mike80]

Ntre Ame at 5 is wayyyyyyyyy too high....so is Bama at 4....oh well...at least Ohio State is top-4...

 

[Dryden]

I got no problem with the Top 6.

 

[Gcashwell]

These are ridiculous rankings. Fortunately, there are a few weeks to work things out. I think this ranking is a product of some of the back loaded schedules that are out there.

To me, a team that doesn't control their own destiny shouldn't be in the top four.

Just kidding, it should be 1. Bama 2. LSU 3. Florida 4. Ole Miss

 

[Saw31]

November will straighten it out. November don't take no shit...

 

[jwinslow]

I got no problem with the Top 6.

I have a pretty huge problem with Bama.

If you're going to say well screw the other stuff we claimed to care about, they're good, then fine but that supposedly wasn't their criteria.

 

[Coqui]

Well one of them will be gone after Saturday.

 

[jwinslow]

Alabama has wins at Texas A&M, at Georgia, and against Wisconsin at a neutral site.

Which one of those is a quality win, exactly? One still doesn't play defense nor start that qb. The second is firing their coach. The third is a poor man's Midwestern rushing team.

That's better than the single best wins of Ohio State, TCU, and Baylor put together, sadly.

had osu won like that against Wisconsin, it would be viewed in a very different light with far less credibility.

I don't mind osu being low. I mind Bama being that high.

Obviously it can fix itself, but this poll last year was lolzomgsecwestrulz.

 

[Jaxbuck]

Bucks are sitting pretty at #3 with #7, #9 and #17 left on the schedule

CFB world is going to need Stanford to keep the Domers out.

Here is a fun scenario: The Gumps beat LSU...media gets Bama cock even further down throat than normal so they are "in" and talked of as #1.....Ole Miss beats LSU and wins SEC ZOMG! West

 

[Gcashwell]

Which one of those is a quality win, exactly? had osu won like that against Wisconsin, it would be viewed in a very different light with far less credibility.

I don't mind osu being low. I mind Bama being that high.

Obviously it can fix itself, but this poll last year was lolzomgsecwestrulz.

Bama's overall strength of schedule is 9, up to this point. That is what the committee is seeing. I still don't think it makes it right. Just be patient and all will work out.

 

[Gcashwell]

Here is a fun scenario: The Gumps beat LSU...media gets Bama cock even further down throat than normal so they are "in" and talked of as #1.....Ole Miss beats LSU and wins SEC ZOMG! West

This is my nightmare.

 

[matcar]

 

[jwinslow]

Bama's overall strength of schedule is 9, up to this point. That is what the committee is seeing. I still don't think it makes it right. Just be patient and all will work out.

Naturally it will. There hasn't been enough time to correct the entire conference being ranked yet.

 

[TooTall]

I have no doubts Bama will be #1 if they beat LSU, which is a crock of shit. You can say they have more quality wins than OSU, Baylor, whoever the hell you want, but that doesn't change the fact that they have a loss, and have the worst performance of anyone in the top 4 ( a loss).

 

[Systems_id]

Which one of those is a quality win, exactly? had osu won like that against Wisconsin, it would be viewed in a very different light with far less credibility.

I don't mind osu being low. I mind Bama being that high.

Obviously it can fix itself, but this poll last year was lolzomgsecwestrulz.

Not only that but at some point losing has to mean something. If I was a Sparty fan, I'd be pissed right now. By the committee's own admission they have a better win than Baylor, Notre Dame, and Alabama yet they're behind ALL THREE of those one loss teams? What kind of logic is that?