tsteele316
Mr. Such and Such
billmac91;1406894; said:CB's taken in first since 2000:
2000 - Ahmed Plummer
2001 - Nate Clements, Will Allen,
2002 - Quentin Jammer, Phillip Buchanon, Lito Sheppard, Mike Rumpf
2003 - Terrance Newman, Marcus Trufant, Andre Woolfolk, Sammy Davis, Nnambi Asomugha
2004 - DeAngelo Hall, Dunta Robertson, Ahmad Carrol, Chris Gamble
2005 - Adam Jones, Antrel Rolle, Carlos Rogers, Fabian Washington, Marlin Jackson
2006 - Tye Hill, Antonio Cromartie, Jonathon Joseph, Kelly Jennings
2007 - Darrelle Revis, Leon Hall, Aaron Ross
2008 - Leodis McKelvin, Dominique Rogers-Cromartie, Aqib Talib, Mike Jenkins, Antoine Cason
I don't see too many flat out busts on that list. And the guys that did bust, didn't lack the ability, they lacked it between the ears. Malcolm isn't lacking anything between the ears, and is about as high character as you can get.
In the case of Antrel Rolle, he's become a solid safety....something Jenkins can do if necessary, although he's going to be a stud.
I'm all for Malcolm, a big name LB in Free Agency, and sliding McDonald down to Nickel.
I'd really rather not have to teach a rookie our LB scheme, and maybe have to sit him a year like Vernon, when you can get production tomorrow out of Malcolm.
I can also see the other side of this argument, I'd just rather take a CB and turn an awful unit into something decent in 1 pick. Malcolm can do that.
flat out busts? not so much. vastly inferior production for where they were picked, quite abundant, and very prevalent in those taken in the top 10. if cleveland was sitting at 10-12, i would have no objection to taking jenkins.
however, cleveland's LB unit is dreadful, they can't stop the run, can't rush the qb, and their secondary last year was one of the best in the NFL in interceptions. furthermore, cleveland is losing 2 starters from that pitiful LB unti to free agency. So, taking a cb at #5 is just not a good pick, regardless of where that cb went to college.
Upvote
0