LitlBuck;1376885; said:Makes you wonder who was really the brains in Baltimore when Savage was there. I read last week in the PD that Romeo told Savage about Bell and Rucker, in addition to Wembley, that they would not fit his system. In addition to the two positions that you mentioned, we also need a OLB or two that can rush the passer in addition to being able to stop the run. Maybe the kid from Wake Forest will be around. I think he is worthy of a very high selection.
tsteele316;1376920; said:utter nonsense.
it was the talk of the '06 draft that savage told crennel that they had wimbley and ngata equally rated and asked him if he wanted a DL or OLB and Crennel told him OLB. So, there is no way that Crennel told Savage that Wimbley wouldn't fit his system.
As for Rucker, he's listed at 260 on the roster, that's plenty big enough to play TE. As for Crennel telling Savage about Bell and Rucker, the PD also ran a piece right after Savage was canned that said he picked Rucker and Bell without ever telling the coaching staff they were targets to get their feedback, and this was highlighted as one of the disconnects between the GM and coaching staff.
So, either the PD is making shit up, you misread, or the PD is contradicting itself and its "sources".
Just sounds like the media piling on after the fact. But back to the draft.
The big question is whether the Wake Forest OLB would fit into a 3-4 LB. Another interesting prospect would be the Florida LB Spikes if he were to come out. And that is if Mangini keeps a 3-4, but I assume he will. So if the top rated LBs don't fit the 3-4, it comes down to Jenkins at CB, or a WR or RB. Cuz you don't take a RT that high in the draft and the top rated DL don't fit the 3-4 from what I have read.
The best option would be to trade down, but doesn't every team in the top 10 say that?
Upvote
0