king rhabuf
Banned
23Skidoo;716024; said:
Why do you want to trade him? Because hes a Wolverine?
You don't give up on a talent like him
Upvote
0
-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter OSUBasketballJunkie
- Start date
Why do you want to trade him? Because hes a Wolverine?
You don't give up on a talent like him
Cornerback6
Optimism Lover
Because he has a piss poor attitude and the last thing a re-building team like the Browns needs is exactly that. I'd pitch Edwards in a heartbeat. He is great trade bait and it seems anymore, tall athletic receivers are a dime a dozen. Look what Brees did with all those young WRs. We'll see what happens.
Upvote
0
king rhabuf
Banned
Cornerback6;718143; said:
Why wouldn't a rebuilding team want a developing #1 WR?
If he wasn't on the team, our receiving core would be terrible and everyone would be saying DRAFT CJ
Upvote
0
23Skidoo
It's so Japaneasy
king rhabuf;718154; said:
Cornerback6 pretty much summed up my position on Braylon. It's not just about him being a weenerine -- it's about the bad vibes, lack of focus, locker room bs, etc. he brings to this team.
As BuckeyeMike80 just noted, the receiving corps is terrible with or without Braylon.
If I could trade Braylon for CJ -- I'd do it in a heartbeat. (Or, to make this easier for you, trade Braylon for a lineman/CB/RB and then draft CJ) From all indications he's got more talent, and far less attitude. He lets the fans scream at GT, wondering why Calvin doesn't get the ball more often, rather than talking smack himself, ripping on Reggie Ball, etc.
The other reason I'd love to trade him is precisely because he does have talent. We wouldn't get anything if we traded Jurevicius or Wilson. Besides, we'd still have Winslow -- who you claimed in the draft thread is "an amazing TE."
Upvote
0
king rhabuf
Banned
23Skidoo;718172; said:
You dont think Winslow is an amazing TE? Keep in mind he was playing at 90% this season.
The problem with our receiving core is dropped passes. Braylon has all the tools to be a #1 WR in the league, Jurevicius is a solid #2, and Wilson needs more playing time to develop (why didn't he play until week 16?)
Braylon/Jurevicius/Wilson/Cribbs is not a talentless group.
Upvote
0
king rhabuf;718519; said:
Private Winslow is an amazing TE, for a SOLDIER
Braylon Edwards looks like Charles Rogers redux at the moment.....
No but you remove Braylon and add someone like CJ and it's 10x better....
Upvote
0
23Skidoo
It's so Japaneasy
king rhabuf;718519; said:
Just another strawman... I said nothing about Winslow.
I quoted you about Winslow because you just finished saying our receiving corps would suck without Braylon. So which way is it? Do we have plenty of talent or are we completely screwed without Braylon? Make up your mind.
Upvote
0
king rhabuf
Banned
BuckeyeMike80;718543; said:
CJ's just a rookie next year. He will have his shares of struggles, plus Charlie and Braylon are developing chemistry.
Foolish to give up on a talent like Braylon after two years.
Upvote
0
king rhabuf;718754; said:
Braylon Edwards throws a sideline hissy fit in the third quarter of Cleveland's 30-0 loss to visiting Cincinnati, but later blames his "passion for the game'' for prompting the outburst, during which he grabbed the jersey of Browns quarterback Charlie Frye.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/don_banks/11/28/vick/index.html
Upvote
0
NFBuck;718769; said:
Braylon Edwards = TO with just as many dropped passes, but fewer Million$ in the bank and less talent
Upvote
0
23Skidoo
It's so Japaneasy
BuckeyeMike80;718771; said:Braylon Edwards = TO with just as many dropped passes, but fewer Million$ in the bank and less talent
and less catches and less touchdowns to boot...
If we could get a decent trade for Braylon, I think we should take it. Reality is, though, I seriously doubt anybody would offer us one.
Upvote
0