Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Jaxbuck;1825423; said:OK, time for a glimpse down the other path. What has the NCAA just done if this is the end of it? What if there is nothing else?
I say they have 1) incentivised every high school coach/parent/guardian/handler in America to shop their athlete. 2) Just effectively killed college sports and 3) rendered themselves obsolete.
OSU_D/;1825474; said:Thanks, Auburn/sCam/Cecil, for showing me how to do it. Now who are the top 5 DT's for 2012 and the names of their parents? I have some envelopes I need to deliver.
You bet your butt that if this is a non-SEC school the player would be kept ineligible by the NCAA.
Jaxbuck;1825423; said:OK, time for a glimpse down the other path. What has the NCAA just done if this is the end of it? What if there is nothing else?
I say they have 1) incentivised every high school coach/parent/guardian/handler in America to shop their athlete. 2) Just effectively killed college sports and 3) rendered themselves obsolete.
I have better [censored] to do tonight and I can't stop thinking about what a horrific decision this is.
Jake;1825476; said:I totally agree with your first point, but the fact is only the very best would have any chance of gaining anything in this manner. A three-star recruit is getting dropped from the list if his dad tries this shit - anywhere. There are also still some families who would never try such a thing.
In the end we're talking about some of the families of the cream of the crop recruits. That's a very small minority. That doesn't mean it isn't a problem, or that the NCAA didn't undermine what's left of its credibility with this particular decision, but I think items 2 and 3 are slightly exaggerated from an overall standpoint.
Jaxbuck;1825491; said:I'm sure most people wouldn't try it at first but as it grows and you see other people "getting theirs" and want to get yours. A market will develop and different skill levels will bring different prices. The fundamental thing is this ruling as it stands right now shows there to be no downside to asking, only potential upside.
Once people become more and more certain/comfortable that there is no risk there will be more and more asking as sure as the sun will rise in the east.
It would be like a big loophole in the income tax code. At first you won't try and game it because you fear consequences but after only so many times of hearing co workers get over on the IRS at the water cooler you are going to try it.
Hopefully it never gets that out of control but based on this decision today how do they punish the next guy? How do you get this genie back in the bottle?
NFBuck;1825486; said:I am coming perilously close to writing off CFB like I have the nba...
Jake;1825498; said:As any guy can attest asking for something and getting it are two different things.
More people may ask, but no one is going to slip an envelope full of cash to a three star recruit. From the boosters and schools perspectives, they're not going to take such risks for anything but elite talent. I'd like to think some, hopefully including Ohio State, would never do it.
I agree with your view on the NCAA's failure, but I disagree on the magnitude of the decision.
billmac91;1825398; said:Not likely...at all. They have a very serious case of voting bribery they are investigating and college football means next to nothing in this situation.
Zippercat;1825510; said:How often, and with how much publicity, has Congress investigated voting bribery compared to NCAA football? There's a lot more political power at the NCAA than you're giving them credit for....and they will have the ability to get access to the Fed's info after the criminal cases have run their routes.