LordJeffBuck;2351048; said:
A factoid from the Wall Street Journal (07/02/2013, no link available):
A good explanation of why the Big Ten is looking to expand into ACC territory, namely Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia.
Very interesting, as far as an ACC network, that would mean a ton of cash. As far as anything else (recruiting, 1st/2nd tier media money) it means very little. They are still a small fish in the pool in most of their markets:
Indiana and Pennsylvania belong to the Big Ten. If Notre Dame fully joins ACC then they will have a foothold in Indiana. But IU owns basketball and Ohio State currently owns all rights to the State of Indiana football.
Florida, Georgia and South Carolina belong to the SEC. Their two biggest football schools are firmly entrenched in SEC territory; to consider Florida ACC territory would be folly.
Big Ten will very soon own New York/New Jersey as I expect Rutgers to blow up compared to Cuse. Rutgers recruiting is already recruiting better than ever (accoring to Scout/Rivals their average 'star' rating is on par with low-mid level Big Ten schools. That market is easily 1/4 of their 55%.
They are also probably including Maryland/DC in their estimate, which is probably 15-20% of their population, which the Big Ten just purchased.
Kentucky is currently shared between the Big Ten and SEC (which the SEC is making a big push to take over the state).
That leaves North Carolina (for now), Virginia (for now) and Massachusettes, which I think may be owned by the Ivy League.
On a separate note: The Grant of Rights will save them until the added value of getting the Big Ten Network in those states exceeds 1/16th of the value of the ACC media contract in a given year. Since we learned recently from the Big East, the media money for college basketball won't save you. At the rate of these contracts rising, expect the disparity between Big Ten/SEC money and ACC money to grow quickly. Schools will get greedy, and in the unlikely event of a mass exodus the GoR essentially becomes void.