Muck;2295513; said:Off the top of my head they've belonged to the Big East, CCHA & ACC.
Sorry. I thought we were talking football.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Muck;2295513; said:Off the top of my head they've belonged to the Big East, CCHA & ACC.
FCollinsBuckeye;2295742; said:
FCollinsBuckeye;2295822; said:I think the bigger takeaway from the MW announcement is the championship game venue provision. As far as I can recall, they are the only (?) conference to do that and under the upcoming 'playoff' format, it makes the absolute most sense. The other conferences are wrapped up in the 'super-bowl' type concept for the CCG and under the 'playoff' format, that model is obsolete, IMO. The CCG games are now more akin to AFC/NFC championship games which rightly give home field advantage to the 'more deserving' team.
My $0.02
FCollinsBuckeye;2295822; said:I think the bigger takeaway from the MW announcement is the championship game venue provision. As far as I can recall, they are the only (?) conference to do that and under the upcoming 'playoff' format, it makes the absolute most sense. The other conferences are wrapped up in the 'super-bowl' type concept for the CCG and under the 'playoff' format, that model is obsolete, IMO. The CCG games are now more akin to AFC/NFC championship games which rightly give home field advantage to the 'more deserving' team.
My $0.02
Buckeye Maniac;2295829; said:The Pac 12 does that too I believe.
Bucknut24;2295830; said:that is correct, CUSA does it as well
FCollinsBuckeye;2295843; said:This is wise and affords the higher rated team a leg up entering the upcoming 'playoff' format. This concept has been discussed at length in this thread, iirc. I suspect the Pac officials considered this angle when setting up this format.
FCollinsBuckeye;2295843; said:CUSA adopting this format is less about competitive advantage in the upcoming 'playoff' than getting butts in seats, imo. I can't imagine many people travelling to see UCF play Tulsa at some neutral locale. I had to Google the 2012 CUSA division champs.
Either way, the B1G should STRONGLY consider abandoning the neutral location 'super bowl' type format and give home field advantage to the higher ranked team.
As mentioned, this has already discussed at length, just seeing the MW take this step makes me question the B1G's decisions......
Piney;2295847; said:You say this... then you say this?
Piney;2295847; said:The B1G just has had the misfortune of not having a Ohio State or Michigan in the title game yet.
jlb1705;2295898; said:Do people really think that's the cure for the B1G title game?
Nebraska travels as well as anybody, and they couldn't be bothered to go to Indianapolis.
My opinion: There's a gameday culture in the SEC that translates very well to the neutral-site format for their championship game. Since they were the first major conference with a championship game, that's the model that everybody has tried to emulate and none have approached the level of success of their event. The culture of B1G football is different. I think it is more closely tied to time and place, and to the campuses and grand coliseums and cathedrals to the game. The B1G championship game will always be sterile, soulless and a notch below until they figure out a way to tap into that sensibility.
Woody1968;2295910; said:To be fair, having the third best team in one of the divisions playing in the game did not help matters. It's also possible that some of the Nebraska fans overlooked Wisconsin, considering they were not division champs, and that Nebraska had already beaten them. Of course, that doesn't excuse the fact that the Nebraska football team did not show up to the game either.
jlb1705;2295898; said:My opinion: There's a gameday culture in the SEC that translates very well to the neutral-site format for their championship game. Since they were the first major conference with a championship game, that's the model that everybody has tried to emulate and none have approached the level of success of their event. The culture of B1G football is different. I think it is more closely tied to time and place,
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;2295903; said:JLB may have hit the nail on the head. As much as we joke about the SEC chant and the fact that they seem to think winning the SEC is more important than the National Title itself, it's that sort of attitude which may be responsible for the relative success of their neutral site game.