Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
JCOSU86;1955554; said:Missouri and Kansas bring a good balance of academics and sports to the picture as well as being traditionally "Midwest" states. Iowa State and Kansas State don't bring much, if anything, but I'd take them over Ntre Ame.
1. Notre Dame has already spurned the Big Ten once, possibly several times, during previous expansion talks. Others can fill you in on the details.knapplc;1955570; said:Really? Notre Dame is a flagship school, one of the pillars of college football, bringing a national audience with them as great or greater than any other school. I'm all big on Nebraska's national cachet but even we don't compare to Notre Dame.
Nothing personal against ISU or KSU - they were great conference mates these many decades past - but they do not compare, in the least, to Notre Dame.
There has to be some other factor going into comments about Notre Dame that I keep reading here. I'm not a fan and I think they're pretentious gits, but to take second-tier schools before them? I don't get it. Can you guys tell me what's up with this thought process? Is this a Big Ten thing, a Buckeye thing, or the opinion of various folks?
Those types of "fans" should be bitch-slapped...LordJeffBuck;1955577; said:but in reality there is very little history between the two schools. Fans, however, don't necessarily see things that way.
Agreed. And I'd love few things more than being able to curb stomp ND on an annual basis...LordJeffBuck;1955577; said:there's no way that ISU, KSU, KU, and Mizzou combined would be better for the Big Ten than Notre Dame.
knapplc;1955570; said:Really? Notre Dame is a flagship school, one of the pillars of college football, bringing a national audience with them as great or greater than any other school. I'm all big on Nebraska's national cachet but even we don't compare to Notre Dame.
Nothing personal against ISU or KSU - they were great conference mates these many decades past - but they do not compare, in the least, to Notre Dame.
There has to be some other factor going into comments about Notre Dame that I keep reading here. I'm not a fan and I think they're pretentious gits, but to take second-tier schools before them? I don't get it. Can you guys tell me what's up with this thought process? Is this a Big Ten thing, a Buckeye thing, or the opinion of various folks?
LordJeffBuck;1955577; said:1. Notre Dame has already spurned the Big Ten once, possibly several times, during previous expansion talks. Others can fill you in on the details.
2. Many Ohio State fans consider Notre Dame our second biggest rival, even though the two schools have only played five times. They are a recruiting rival to be sure, but in reality there is very little history between the two schools. Fans, however, don't necessarily see things that way.
3. There are a lot of Notre Dame fans in Buckeye country, and as you noted they are typically "pretentious gits".
With that being said, the Big Ten would be crazy not to accept Notre Dame, and there's no way that ISU, KSU, KU, and Mizzou combined would be better for the Big Ten than Notre Dame.
MililaniBuckeye;1955586; said:Agreed. And I'd love few things more than being able to curb stomp ND on an annual basis...
Darkmyst;1955613; said:Vanderbilt and Florida are the only two SEC schools that are AAU members. That's pretty much a must for B10 membership isn't it?
knapplc;1955619; said:It used to be until we lowered our standards with the Corn-tards. I don't care if they get the death penalty!
Wait - what?!?! I'm not ORD! !! ! ! ! !
knapplc;1955619; said:It used to be until we lowered our standards with Corn Aggy.
Wait - what?!?! I'm not ORD! !! ! ! ! !
JCOSU86;1955554; said:Missouri and Kansas bring a good balance of academics and sports to the picture as well as being traditionally "Midwest" states. Iowa State and Kansas State don't bring much, if anything, but I'd take them over Ntre Ame.
OSU_D/;1955637; said:What???? I guess if you consider Nebraska to be a great Big 10 academic fit then perhaps Missou and KU are are a good balance of academics and sports. In reality they would rank at the back end of the Big 10 in academics, just like Nebraska, and offer much much much less than several of the Eastern to Mid-Atlantic schools in terms of sports cache and eyeballs for the BTN.
I prefaced it by saying ideally. I know Georgia and Texas A&M are unrealistic by any stretch of the imagination. Georgia Tech has been talked about quite a bit as a possibility over the past 6-9 months though... I thought why not Georgia? I think Georgia has much more to offer the conference than GT and I'd been of the impression that Georgia isn't 100% happy with the daily goings-on with the SEC. They don't participate with the oversigning year after year and perpetual douche-baggery of their brethren.JCOSU86;1955563; said:No offense intended, B20, but that is laughable.