• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
I have to think that Mike Slive is in some bunker trying to figure out a way to steal Texas, now that descending on the Big-12 to cherry pick teams is OK.

The Arkansas history in the old Southwest Conference would be a plus for us, and getting Oklahoma and Texas in the mix (or Texas and Louisville for that matter - FSU brings us not one new TV viewer), might be cause enough for Mike to make a run at it.

While Texas has got that western thing working, they are still a variant of Southern - and we would love to have them.
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1660830; said:
I have to think that Mike Slive is in some bunker trying to figure out a way to steal Texas, now that descending on the Big-12 to cherry pick teams is OK.

The Arkansas history in the old Southwest Conference would be a plus for us, and getting Oklahoma and Texas in the mix (or Texas and Louisville for that matter - FSU brings us not one new TV viewer), might be cause enough for Mike to make a run at it.

While Texas has got that western thing working, they are still a variant of Southern - and we would love to have them.

bugger off, we called it first
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1660830; said:
I have to think that Mike Slive is in some bunker trying to figure out a way to steal Texas, now that descending on the Big-12 to cherry pick teams is OK.

The Arkansas history in the old Southwest Conference would be a plus for us, and getting Oklahoma and Texas in the mix (or Texas and Louisville for that matter - FSU brings us not one new TV viewer), might be cause enough for Mike to make a run at it.

While Texas has got that western thing working, they are still a variant of Southern - and we would love to have them.


I don't see that Louisville would add TV viewers either. UK pretty much has all of Kentucky in its pocket.
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1660830; said:
I have to think that Mike Slive is in some bunker trying to figure out a way to steal Texas, now that descending on the Big-12 to cherry pick teams is OK.

The Arkansas history in the old Southwest Conference would be a plus for us, and getting Oklahoma and Texas in the mix (or Texas and Louisville for that matter - FSU brings us not one new TV viewer), might be cause enough for Mike to make a run at it.

While Texas has got that western thing working, they are still a variant of Southern - and we would love to have them.
Oklahoma & Oklahoma St are a perfect fit for SEC athletics, academics & culture.

Texas only fits in athletics, imo.

The b10 has athletics & academics to offer, the culture is certainly all their own down there.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Another reason we want UT.

michelle_beadle_hotdog.gif
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;1660878; said:
Gator, some day Florida is going to have to face up to the fact that they and Vandy have chosen to be the only schools in that conference that haven't gone full retard. That's not going to change.
What - you want us to start screaming "A-A-U....A-A-U.....A-A-U" :lol:

If anyone is ever dumb enough to try to back the SEC in an SEC vs Big-10 academic food fight, you can bet it won't be me.
 
Upvote 0
That Barking Carnival piece made a very good point bringing up the Texas legislature implications. A&M and UT are attached at the hip for that and other reasons.

Yes, they're weird, easy to make fun of, but looking at them purely as a research institution, they're very solid.

So it's probably a package deal. To put it in a different perspective, that's adding almost 100,000 undergrads and grad students, over a million living alumni, and whatever the addition of UT would add in terms of TV sets, increase that by another 50% or so.
 
Upvote 0
EngineerHorn;1660908; said:
That Barking Carnival piece made a very good point bringing up the Texas legislature implications. A&M and UT are attached at the hip for that and other reasons.

Yes, they're weird, easy to make fun of, but looking at them purely as a research institution, they're very solid.

So it's probably a package deal. To put it in a different perspective, that's adding almost 100,000 undergrads and grad students, over a million living alumni, and whatever the addition of UT would add in terms of TV sets, increase that by another 50% or so.

Them boys gonna have to leave their swords and nazi nurse boots in Closet Station before heading North.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top