I dont even know if I have the time to sit here and really write everything that I think about this whole situation. Should College players get more than what they get? Maybe. I say maybe because I honestly want say no but I could be swayed. Do I think they should get 'paid'. Absolutely not, and there are a ton of reasons why.
Student athletes are afforded alot of things regular people and students never get. They get a legit shot at an A plus education, and they get a chance to live a dream, and pay nothing for two things that are invaluable.
People will go back and fourth about the education part of it. It doesnt matter if a player's only intention in life is to play football - given what we know about sports injury's, pro bust, etc. only a fool wouldn't take a chance at a backup plan. This is something kids play 30k plus for, and they dont get to play sports on TV.
Players are also given the chance to become Pro's. Without college football I'd be willing to bet less than 1% of the freshman enrolled for next year would be able to make it to pro level ball on there own. Think about the coaching they get, the training, the facilities. They get training that athletes pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to get. They'll take a skinny wideout and turn him into randy moss if he's got the work ethic - which is what it takes to be a pro. Where would any of these kids be without all of this training? Yeah, im sure D-league system would work wonders for these guys. Coaches at the pro level aren't going to teach young kids like college coaches will. These kids are afforded all the tools needed to become a pro at the highest level. All of this crap cost money. I dont know if I've ever seen a highschool kid that could graduate and walk into the NFL.
Who decides who gets paid what? What about the guy's riding the bench? Do they get a cut? Is there ANY WAY that this could be done in a fair way? What does the kicker get if he wins the national titles with his foot? Can of worms people, can of worms.