• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

AAU Kicks Out Nebraska

OSU_Buckguy

Head Coach
i posted this in the nebraska football thread, but i thought it was worthy of its own thread...


Research universities group (AAU) ends UNL's membership

An association of 63 top research universities in the country has booted the University of Nebraska-Lincoln from the group.

The Association of American Universities' members voted to end UNL's membership recently based on the university's inability to meet certain requirements, Chancellor Harvey Perlman said in an email to faculty and staff Friday. The vote required a two-thirds majority of the group's 62 other members.

...

In an interview Friday, Perlman said he didn't think the AAU's decision would affect the university's efforts to garner research dollars or top faculty. He said it also likely wouldn't affect UNL's entry into the Big Ten Conference, a transition that officially takes place July 1.

However, Perlman admitted the university's membership in the AAU was likely a factor in the Big Ten's decision to invite UNL to join last year.

"I would assume it might have been (a factor) just because they're all AAU institutions," he said.

He said most of the 11 other Big Ten universities supported UNL's efforts to remain in the AAU, as well as all of the Big 12 universities.

"I honestly don't think it's going to change anything," he said. "I suppose it will be, in the short-term, an embarrassment."
 
Not having any understanding of the inner workings, I found this interesting:

UNL joined the AAU in 1909. Perlman said UNL has ranked at the bottom of the AAU's members for more than a decade based on the group's ranking system, which ranks all research universities. That ranking system consists of four criteria: research expenditures, National Academy members, faculty awards (from a specified list) and citations.
Those criteria are weighted based on the number of tenure-track faculty at a particular university. Based on those criteria, a number of non-AAU institutions ranked higher than 15 AAU institutions, including UNL, Perlman said.
He said those four criteria unfairly disadvantaged UNL because the University of Nebraska system is organized with separate flagship (UNL) and medical campuses (the University of Nebraska Medical Center). Most AAU institutions have medical schools, which tend to garner large amounts of research dollars, Perlman said.
"With UNMC's research included we would have had research expenditures above many other AAU institutions," he said.
Another disadvantage that UNL faced was that the AAU devalues agricultural research and doesn't allow member universities to include research funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a major source of funding for UNL. However, the association does count agricultural faculty when weighting rankings, Perlman said.
"Because of our strong commitment as a land-grant institution to serving the State of Nebraska, we are seriously disadvantaged within the AAU ranking system," he said.
 
Upvote 0
I'm expecting ORD's consequential post to be either very short (something like "I told you those academic fuck-sticks at CornAggy weren't good enough!"), or long enough to rival any rant that Gator has managed to post. :wink:


Well...I'm only half joking.
 
Upvote 0
FCollinsBuckeye;1914394; said:
He can't type while he's shaking with rage.

:wink:
snob.jpg


Well....that disturbs the pairings of our AAU Bridge soiree'. I don't know why we invited those people to join in the first place. Good heavens, after our introductory mixer I was forced to look up the term "John Deere Green".....imagine!
 
Upvote 0
The story didn't specify if Nebraska could get back in? I imagine it would take a number of years to get back in, if they could, right (after years of studying the school)?

Does the university care or are they even trying to change the things to get re-admitted (story didn't say)?
 
Upvote 0
Perlman said most of the 11 other Big Ten universities supported UNL's efforts to remain in the AAU, as did all of the Big 12 universities in the AAU.

I love it that at least one Big Ten school voted to curb their ass.

Gordon Gee, "I'm so [censored]ing [censored]ed at Jim Tressel that I'm really going to stick my foot up corn aggy's ass."

Absolutely [censored]ing ridiculous. All we heard about was how much improvement Nowledge was making and how they would really close the gap between themselves and Sparty over their first few years in the Big Ten. What do we get? We get epic [censored]ing corntard fail. Congratulations you slopeheaded mongoloids. You've just made the Big Ten no longer the only major athletic conference where every member is also an AAU member. What further academic shame do you have in store for us?

seanpenn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The committee that was formed to investigate the retention of the corntards voted 9-1 to let them go. The other members largely just went with that committee recommend.

I cannot find the vote detailed anywhere. Like Yale's Skull and Bones, they probably have some secret and esoteric method of voting, like carving it into the left thigh of a hooker and then letting the new guy - Georgia Tech - dispose of the body. At any rate, the name of Nee-bras-ka has been scrubbed from the website, and the faint sound of the Nebraska Provost whining about it does not receive any press. No mention of how Florida or Vandy voting can be found on the SEC boards.
 
Upvote 0
muffler dragon;1914358; said:
Not having any understanding of the inner workings, I found this interesting:

I'd like to know the other fourteen. I'm certain that we're fine. We rank in the top ten (public or private) for research funding, have a fair (but not great) number of National Academy members on faculty (about 30) and do very well in Fulbrights, Guggenheims and AAAS Fellows. I'm sure that our faculty is cited fairly often given our department rankings (generally top 15 to top30) from the National Research Council.

The one thing to remember when corn aggy starts to rationalize this as solely not having a med school or ag research not being counted (which I kinda disagree with) is that there are a lot of other ag-heavy and/or non-med school universities that just didn't have their testicles kicked up into their chest.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;1914543; said:
I have to think that the current Big Ten/CIC membership had a sense that Nebraska's membership was in jeopardy before even inviting them to the conference... right?

Article says they've been fighting it off for decade, which makes me even more pissed that we accepted them.
 
Upvote 0
MaxBuck;1914611; said:
Agricultural research not being "counted" is absurd. There's nothing about ag research that makes it less important than, say, research into linguistics. I'd argue, quite the opposite.
Having a several decades "head's up" on how to get right with the AAU, and then getting butt hurt when they finally launch you, is absurd.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top