• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
If thats the case, it was designed, then you have the crux of all the problems. Piss poor scheme and assignment. That shit aint gonna cut it unless you have Chase Young running step for step with someone. Then to blitz the LB who would have the flat or better cover angle. Fire everyone involved who came up with this garbage.

It wasn't a bad call actually. But to your point, calling THAT assignment with a dude at DE that would probably be better served as a 3-tech is malpractice.

1. He could probably be the slowest DE on the team. He wasn't going to stay on top of the RB long enough to get the QB to come off that read. (even though there were crossing routes open in the middle of the field)
2. He has no experience running that. If you call that assignment, run it with somebody who knows not to step up field too hard.
 
Upvote 0
So having read all of the reactions to this game before watching it this evening (some of them on twitter, which is my failure), I'm confused by how I saw a number of takes like:

1) "How can they not generate pressure on the QB?" They did this almost non stop from the 2nd quarter on, sometimes to a fault. To Tulsa's credit, they stood in there and took some shots. And this was without Harrison. JT & Sawyer flashed, but so did others. This is far from the lines they'll see later, but it's a welcome change.

2) "These guys are not being put in a position to succeed" I'd argue they went almost the entire 2nd and 3rd quarter in a great position to succeed. Tulsa outflanked them once, and that came after the offense sputtered repeatedly on multiple disjointed drives.

3) "Day has to [blank] CJ". #7 was not consistent, but there was a lot of sloppy play at most positions on offense in this game. Drops, false starts, fumbles, just a lack of consistency. Now if you want to get deep with it and say that Stroud is limited with the injury and the knowledge of that is leading to weak attitudes, I guess you could make that stretch, but there are a lot of veterans punching further below their grade than CJ, who has been doing this for 3 games.

I saw a young, somewhat inexperienced but more aggressive defense than earlier in the year. Martinez forced two picks (one of which he caught). He also made a few mistakes, but he has the makings of a third quality CB to go with Burke and Brown (assuming Banks is still limited and Watts is a floating hybrid).

They picked on Ransom a bit, though the Johnson TD was the fault of the corner, not Ransom.

After that, 10 min left in 4th, 3rd down, under duress, CJ hits Wilson on a crossing route. He's 3 yds from the first down marker, has absolutely no one between him and the pylon, and has Olave peeling back to help block (later). He instead pauses (to cut back?), and stops to wait for 3 defenders to swallow him up.

On the next drive, the OSU LBs make a mistake and give up a big run. The next down, the D destroys the QB and somehow the ball floats like a wounded duck over the middle without being picked. The next play Williams on a huge sack.

OSU rips off two huge runs, and then they milk the clock with Teague to take the lead, followed by a TD to Wilson.

The pick six is forced by #44's pressure. He was tackled but makes the QB panic rolling the wrong way

Tulsa makes a nice throw down the seam. The next play OSU eats Tulsa alive upfront and draws a penalty.

Moving Watts around may not work all year, but it's bringing a new element and athleticism to the back end, instead of having an overmatched Shaw as the only option. Really like using his range, length and athleticism in a new way. He was an intriguing corner but they have more than a few of those.

OSU plays it safe and yields a run rather than a longer pass. Sawyer eats on the next down and draws another penalty.

..

If you want to pass generic criticism about why are they struggling with such a mid major team, fine. But there was a ton of progress there, and I swear Twitter has taught our country to just repeat what they read in earlier tweets.

My favorite was when rabinowitz blamed the turf for tripping up Henderson when he bounced towards the top of the screen (early ob and was actually tripped by a human. And 90% of the responses piled on with how bad the turf is. There are scores of examples over the years of why the turf is bad. There's entire game of it. But while there were a few people pointing out the obvious rebuttal, most people didn't even watch the embedded video to notice.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
So having read all of the reactions to this game before watching it this evening (some of them on twitter, which is my failure), I'm confused by how I saw a number of takes like:

1) "How can they not generate pressure on the QB?" They did this almost non stop from the 2nd quarter on, sometimes to a fault. To Tulsa's credit, they stood in there and took some shots. And this was without Harrison. JT & Sawyer flashed, but so did others. This is far from the lines they'll see later, but it's a welcome change.

2) "These guys are not being put in a position to succeed" I'd argue they went almost the entire 2nd and 3rd quarter in a great position to succeed. Tulsa outflanked them once, and that came after the offense sputtered repeatedly on multiple disjointed drives.

3) "Day has to [blank] CJ". #7 was not consistent, but there was a lot of sloppy play at most positions on offense in this game. Drops, false starts, fumbles, just a lack of consistency. Now if you want to get deep with it and say that Stroud is limited with the injury and the knowledge of that is leading to weak attitudes, I guess you could make that stretch, but there are a lot of veterans punching further below their grade than CJ, who has been doing this for 3 games.

I saw a young, somewhat inexperienced but more aggressive defense than earlier in the year. Martinez forced two picks (one of which he caught). He also made a few mistakes, but he has the makings of a third quality CB to go with Burke and Brown (assuming Banks is still limited and Watts is a floating hybrid).

They picked on Ransom a bit, though the Johnson TD was the fault of the corner, not Ransom.

After that, 10 min left in 4th, 3rd down, under duress, CJ hits Wilson on a crossing route. He's 3 yds from the first down marker, has absolutely no one between him and the pylon, and has Olave peeling back to help block (later). He instead pauses (to cut back?), and stops to wait for 3 defenders to swallow him up.

On the next drive, the OSU LBs make a mistake and give up a big run. The next down, the D destroys the QB and somehow the ball floats like a wounded duck over the middle without being picked. The next play Williams on a huge sack.

OSU rips off two huge runs, and then they milk the clock with Teague to take the lead, followed by a TD to Wilson.

The pick six is forced by #44's pressure. He was tackled but makes the QB panic rolling the wrong way

Tulsa makes a nice throw down the seam. The next play OSU eats Tulsa alive upfront and draws a penalty.

Moving Watts around may not work all year, but it's bringing a new element and athleticism to the back end, instead of having an overmatched Shaw as the only option. Really like using his range, length and athleticism in a new way. He was an intriguing corner but they have more than a few of those.

OSU plays it safe and yields a run rather than a longer pass. Sawyer eats on the next down and draws another penalty.

..

If you want to pass generic criticism about why are they struggling with such a mid major team, fine. But there was a ton of progress there, and I swear Twitter has taught our country to just repeat what they read in earlier tweets.

My favorite was when rabinowitz blamed the turf for tripping up Henderson when he bounced towards the top of the screen (early ob and was actually tripped by a human. And 90% of the responses piled on with how bad the turf is. There are scores of examples over the years of why the turf is bad. There's entire game of it. But while there were a few people pointing out the obvious rebuttal, most people didn't even watch the embedded video to notice.

Watts could be that centerfielder back there with his athleticism. Need a safety that the QB is afraid of.
 
Upvote 0
I think Pope and Gant's leaving of the program is the counter to a number of us calling for more snaps for the underclassmen. As good as the young guys looked, the adverse reaction is that some of the upperclassmen aren't going to be always be so happy for their younger counterparts. This is always the chemistry worry in college sports. One guy has been with the program for 3+ years, and another comes in 9mos ago, and sometimes the frosh just look and play better. And not to mention, the intangibles that go on off the field(grades, studying playbook, etc). The fact that the staff is more willing to play Chambers, who has barely been a LB for a few months, and Simon who is just in his 4th CFB over a 4 year player like Pope or Gant speaks pretty loudly.
And with the increased play from the Bullet position, OSU could afford to lose both LBs, and not lose too much depth. And getting PG eligible helps he depth that much more
 
Upvote 0
Only having watched it once, with a healthy amount of bourbon in me, I think I saw a lot of the "off speed" pitches we've been so desperately needing. For bonus points, I think I also saw guys who mostly, looking at you Banks, knew what they were doing and were even bold enough to jump some routes. X and O guys would have to say for sure but that part felt encouraging. Even though it was Akron, that's more coaching and assignment stuff that isn't influenced by the physical mismatches.

The DL dominating Akron OL, otoh, is 100% due to physical mismatches and means next to nothing to me. The only positive I can come up with here is that confidence can be a funny thing. Sometimes a free throw gets a great basketball scorer going so maybe mauling a bad MAC OL will get these guys going? That's all I've got.

Very interested to hear from the film breakdown guys this week.
 
Upvote 0


Without Gant and Pope, the Buckeyes have just six scholarship linebackers who are currently available to play: Teradja Mitchell, Cody Simon, Tommy Eichenberg, Steele Chambers, Palaie Gaoteote and Reid Carrico. Mitchell Melton is currently unavailable due to injury.

Just sayin': Won't help this year, but (so far) the strength of the 2022 class are the linebackers:

ekwjtwhrkvftvsskuhue

Gabe Powers: 5 Star

and

sm4ufi6obtexqgrfygom

CJ Hicks: 5 Star
 
Upvote 0
The defensive staff Day assembled this year seems peculiar for a coach with his chops.

Mattison, his salary and breadth of experience leaves.
Day’s response is to promote Barnes (a guy Maryland chose not to retain, though Locksley is a devout moron) and appoint a a GA whose name I don’t know (Sara Jessica Parker?) to coach special teams.

Special teams have basically legislated out of the game.

Day has to be his own coach but the team seems to have lost some of the hard edge they had under a Meyer.

I think it was Tim May who said the atmosphere in the facility is different under Meyer. There was more of a walking egg shells feel.

Of course I think the days of an Urban Meyer type attitude are waning in a society where 42% of kids are tranny’s or have mental health issues, and the advent of the portal.

I know we are dealing or dealt with COVID but our “not available” lists are absurd on a weekly basis.

I hope to look back at this post and point out how it didn’t age well.
 
Upvote 0
The defensive staff Day assembled this year seems peculiar for a coach with his chops.

Mattison, his salary and breadth of experience leaves.
Day’s response is to promote Barnes (a guy Maryland chose not to retain, though Locksley is a devout moron) and appoint a a GA whose name I don’t know (Sara Jessica Parker?) to coach special teams.

Special teams have basically legislated out of the game.

Day has to be his own coach but the team seems to have lost some of the hard edge they had under a Meyer.

I think it was Tim May who said the atmosphere in the facility is different under Meyer. There was more of a walking egg shells feel.

Of course I think the days of an Urban Meyer type attitude are waning in a society where 42% of kids are tranny’s or have mental health issues, and the advent of the portal.

I know we are dealing or dealt with COVID but our “not available” lists are absurd on a weekly basis.

I hope to look back at this post and point out how it didn’t age well.
I would think it wouldn't matter the coaching style in regards to the atmosphere at the woody with either Day or UFM.

I agree though we maybe could've made better hires. The way I see it is Ryan is an offensive coach which gives us 6 on that side of the ball with Day, Hartline, Stud, Wilson, Dennis and Alford. On defense we only have 4 with Johnson, Coombs, Washington and Barnes. Why we needed a coach 100% dedicated to special teams is beyond me and IMO we probably should've tried to land a Co DC with Kerry that has experience like a Mattison.

The defense was left with little options in regards to the staff and we ran into worse case this year too with Coombs clearly not cut out to be a DC.

I doubt Ryan will replace Fleming with another defensive coach next year but it sure would be nice if we could add another defensive staff.
 
Upvote 0
Good point on Day’s expertise being on the offensive side.
Makes even less sense to have only 4 defensive assistants.
Especially, given that Mattison had a wealth of experience in CFB and the NFL.
We basically replaced him with a GA special teams coach.
And again special teams have lost the ability to impact the game because of the new rules.
2 games into the season and Coombs has basically been cast in the role of the frumpy husband in a cuckhold porn, watching the game from the press box.
In my mind the value of Coombs was his on-field energy. I really don’t think this makeup is sustainable after this season.
 
Upvote 0
Biggest improvement for the Defense this week is that the set and maintained the edge. Except for one play where Irons ran a misdirection keeper and got outside JTT, they maintained the edge very well allowing the pressure up the middle to get home and set the tone.

People will say, "it was Akron" but that QB from Akron has more athleticism than any other we'll play this year so it was a test. Hopefully they continue that and when we play Martinez and Corn, it'll pay dividends.
 
Upvote 0
Biggest improvement for the Defense this week is that the set and maintained the edge. Except for one play where Irons ran a misdirection keeper and got outside JTT, they maintained the edge very well allowing the pressure up the middle to get home and set the tone.

People will say, "it was Akron" but that QB from Akron has more athleticism than any other we'll play this year so it was a test. Hopefully they continue that and when we play Martinez and Corn, it'll pay dividends.
granted... but the problem with tulsa and oregon wasn't necessary / entirely because of their QBs, was it? their RBs were burning as just as much or even more than their QBs.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top