I got much older today. Im pretty salty.
It's just disappointing that the administrators of the B1G seemed to barely put up a fight to have a season.
You hear them say "Our priority is the health and safety of our student-athletes." OK. That's good. But I have a question: Do you know for certain that football players are safer by not playing football? If the answer is yes, then they made the right decision, but I dont think they have any idea.
If players have a season to play, their time is scheduled, they are motivated to remain healthy, they would be regularly tested, monitored by team doctors, etc.
Without football, I would assume that they will be, well, college students - partying and chasing tail.
Got a feeling this is about what is easiest for administrators in terms of PR and liability rather than what is best for student-athletes.