WolverineMike;1784902; said:is there much of a difference in letting a team pass for 400 or rush for 400?
Is there a difference between Navy and Texas Tech?
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WolverineMike;1784902; said:is there much of a difference in letting a team pass for 400 or rush for 400?
I am not sure how knowing our defense is going to get rolled makes it any more acceptable when it happens.
Is anybody surprised by this? I certainly hope not.TomBeaver wrote: I've been saying the games'd be highscoring since the Spring ... in fact I've been saying it over, and over, and over, and over ...
FranchiseUofM wrote: The O is way ahead of where we thought it would be. The D is way behind where we thought it would be.
Both are very noteworthy, and worthy of much discussion / debate.
actually ... we dont know that, not with the new-style-U ... because, as RR says, they are just getting going on O ... next year will be even better
It's watching the Oregon-Stanford game that has me thinking along these lines -- it's all-O being played there too
FranchiseUofM wrote: Tom - - - this is the part of the debate that doesn't make sense to me.
Of course everybody would be happy winning every game no matter what the score is. But we've all watched enough football to know that the likelihood of that happening is essentially zero if we play D like this.
Again, I love Coach Rod, and I love the offense. I haven't had this much fun watching UofM football in a long long time (and I've been watching for a LONG time). But I'm disappointed we're not playing better D. We are absolutely capable of doing GREAT things with this offense playing at a higher level than anybody thought possible at this point. But I'm frustrated that the D might be too much in the way.beav said:Watching Stanford-Oregon, the question comes into my mind...
The first punt of that game finally happened with 4 minutes left in the half ... 28-24 with more perhaps to come before half.
(yes I'm flipping back and forth with PSU/Iowa -- but I go to sleep when that game is on ... what a snoozer the old-B10 stuff seems like now ...)
Anyway, the question pops into my mind... would you be happy with U-M winning 8 more games this year by last second 42-35 scores? Somehow, based on the correspondence I've been getting ... I think not.
It's just amazing to me that U-M is 5-0 for just the 3rd time in the 13 years since the NC ...and some people are acting like they haven't won yet this year.
Calling out thomas's lack of grammar skills = classic.
Nominate | Report Posted: Yesterday 11:44 PM
Re: ***FranchiseUofM - you're "We" doesn't include
"Your" on quite the crusade, eh tom?TomBeaver wrote: I've been saying the games'd be highscoring since the Spring ... in fact I've been saying it over, and over, and over, and over ...Reply | QuoteFranchiseUofM wrote: The O is way ahead of where we thought it would be. The D is way behind where we thought it would be.
Both are very noteworthy, and worthy of much discussion / debate.
- <LI class=username>uofmfan4 <LI class=tpmemberstatus>
<LI class=tpmemberstatus>All-American <LI class=tpmemberinfo>1181 posts this site <LI class=tpmemberinfo>Ignore this Member- Send Private Message
Nominate | Report Posted: Yesterday 11:47 PM
Re: For the umpteenth time ... what has changed?
QFT.
But tom said the D would struggle so we can't say bad things or else "your" not a michigan fan!!
They've essentially been facing the equivalent each week...broken24;1785041; said:Funny thing I heard on ESPN tonight. May was going on about how great Denard is and Holtz says; "Imagine how good he is in practice against Michigan's defense"'
broken24;1785041; said:Funny thing I heard on ESPN tonight. May was going on about how great Denard is and Holtz says; "Imagine how good he is in practice against Michigan's defense"'
broken24;1785041; said:Funny thing I heard on ESPN tonight. May was going on about how great Denard is and Holtz says; "Imagine how good he is in practice against Michigan's defense"'
Is it fun to watch a team run the same 3 plays over and over? I never thought it was fun to watch Pat White do it, either.......it's more annoying than anything else.On ESPN2 last night, Robert Smith was talking about how much fun it is to watch Denard; however, there's going to be a time soon when the defense is a liability and the Wolverines lose.
BuckeyeNation27;1785131; said:Is it fun to watch a team run the same 3 plays over and over? I never thought it was fun to watch Pat White do it, either.......it's more annoying than anything else.
muffler dragon;1785120; said:On ESPN2 last night, Robert Smith was talking about how much fun it is to watch Denard; however, there's going to be a time soon when the defense is a liability and the Wolverines lose.
BuckeyeNation27;1785131; said:Is it fun to watch a team run the same 3 plays over and over? I never thought it was fun to watch Pat White do it, either.......it's more annoying than anything else.
WolverineMike;1785464; said:he really went out on a limb there........
muffler dragon;1785514; said:I was just surprised to hear it from a pundit. I've heard/seen a great deal about how Heisman Denard is doing this and that without much consideration to the coming reality.