jlb1705;1654237; said:OK, suppose one thinks that the Buckeyes have taken too few OL over the years. Wouldn't it follow then that they've taken an excess in another area? What area would that be? Has that position group benefitted from having the extra bodies?
Let's say the team has been taking an excess of DBs at the expense of the OL. What happens if you take those roster spots away from DBs and put them on the OL? You might have a better chance of improving your OL but maybe a lower chance of having a solid group of DBs. I think people are taking the other side of this thing for granted. What happens to the DB group if the scholarships that went to guys like Jenkins, Youboty & Chekwa went to OL? Compound that situation with the loss of guys like the Underwood brothers and Clifford, and guys like Ginn and Gonzo going over to the other side of the ball (didn't the conventional recruiting wisdom have both of those guys as DBs?)
It's really easy to say that you'd bring in more scholarship OL as if it occurs in a vacuum, but in reality where are those spots coming from? How would that affect other units on the team? How would it affect the team's chances to win games, beat M*ch*g*n and go to BCS bowls?
First my disclaimer that I'm not hung up on the OL numbers like Duane Long and some others and you are absolutely correct in stating you have to take from one to add to another.
That said, if you are asking me to do a basic marginal cost vs marginal revenue problem between DB's and OL then I'm taking the marginal production from the OL 7 days a week and twice on Sundays.
Upvote
0