2009 TSUN News
Here's an interesting breakdown by ErocWolverine on S&M of their lack of depth...
Eroc is one of a handful of very objective posters over there for those unfamiliar with him. Doesn't paint a pretty picture at all. I'm still curious to see how well a defense like that can handle some of the power running teams in the Big-10. I'm not convinced running that as a base package (particularly with their depth issues) is such a good idea.
In fairlness, I'm interested to see how well, if at all, Robinson can correct or atleast improve these problems by September. He's only been on the job a brief time and is, by most accounts, an excellent DC. How much power he has and how much is delegated to his (or DR's depending on how you look at it) deputies has a play in this.jwinslow;1453100; said:I can buy the changing systems hurting their ability to be a strong defense. I just don't buy it prevents them from fielding a defense altogether, when tackling, pursuit angles and basic fundamentals continue to plague the UM defense. They may not have great depth, but they still have far more talent on their roster than most of their opponents, including little brother.
MSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, Purdue, Minnesota, Northwestern... these teams rarely field one player with the talent of a Terrance Taylor, let alone a Graham, Warren, Cissoko, Turner, etc.
Here's an interesting breakdown by ErocWolverine on S&M of their lack of depth...
- <LI class=username>ErocWolverine <LI class=tpmemberstatus>
<LI class=tpmemberstatus>All-American <LI class=tpmemberinfo>12251 posts this site <LI class=tpmemberinfo>Ignore this Member- Send Private Message
Nominate | Report Posted: Today 2:09 AM
Re: UofM LB's need or want?
Well first off there is two linebacker positions (both inside) along with a spinner position that is a cross between a defensive end and a linebacker and then the hybrid position that is a cross between a safety and a linebacker. That is something people need to understand that players like Hawthorne, Herron, Jones, Evans, Kinard will not play inside linebacker.
In the spring they had 3 healthy schollie for the linebacker position (Fitzgerald, Obi, and Demens). Mouton was out. They had 3 walk-ons and that was it for that position. That is not good especially for two spots on the defense.
M. Robinson will play safety at Michigan especially with the depth issues that Michigan has or will have there when he arrives. Anyway if he would move it would be to S. Brown position as a hybrid, but we already have two young players there in Jones and Hawthorne.
Herron plays the spinner position.
Evans plays the spinner position.
Hawthorne plays the hybrid position.
Jones plays the hybrid position.
Bell not really sure where he plays ... I would like to see him at linebacker, but they might try him at safety first especially with depth issues.
B. Smith moving to linebacker will help, but hard to count on a kid especially since he only played the position a couple of practices so far.
Kinard will play either defensive end or spinner ... imo.
We have 5 players for 2 spots on the defense now ... Mouton (who is injuried), Obi, Fitzgerald, B. Smith, Demens, ... maybe Bell. That is not good depth let alone good quality depth for two positions on defense.
Eroc is one of a handful of very objective posters over there for those unfamiliar with him. Doesn't paint a pretty picture at all. I'm still curious to see how well a defense like that can handle some of the power running teams in the Big-10. I'm not convinced running that as a base package (particularly with their depth issues) is such a good idea.
Last edited:
Upvote
0