Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
HailToMichigan;1298918; said:Are we? Who on offense is going to be taken in the draft? I don't see a single prospect this year. On defense, there's Graham if he leaves, and Taylor.
And you're missing the point. Illinois beat you guys, so according to the line of reasoning that's being used here, either Illinois is more talented than you or Zook is a better coach than Tressel. I doubt you'd get a single person here to claim that's the case. Upsets happen for other reasons, not least of which would be that the offense is run by a freshman quarterback operating behind a terrible offensive line. I suppose we could have a big-ass sophomore quarterback operating behind a terrible offensive line made up of different players if RR hadn't "run them off."
HailToMichigan;1298918; said:And you're missing the point. Illinois beat you guys, so according to the line of reasoning that's being used here, either Illinois is more talented than you or Zook is a better coach than Tressel.
But when Mark Dantonio blames missed tackles and turnovers for his loss this week, that makes him a solid coach who will lead LB to glory.NFBuck;1298999; said:Wow, okay, maybe the line of reasoning presented wasn't perfect, but surely even you, as Dick's BP public defender, can see the difference in losing to a 9-4 team that would go on to the Rose Bowl and a 1-4 bottom-feeding MAC team...
I also find it striking how Dick seems to be pretty quick to deflect almost all of the blame on the players and takes little to none for himself...yep, still an ass.
HailToMichigan;1299061; said:But when Mark Dantonio blames missed tackles and turnovers for his loss this week, that makes him a solid coach who will lead LB to glory.
HailToMichigan;1299061; said:But when Mark Dantonio blames missed tackles and turnovers for his loss this week, that makes him a solid coach who will lead LB to glory.
Michigan's Brandon Graham boldly predicts victory over Michigan State
by Pete Bigelow | The Ann Arbor News
Monday October 20, 2008, 4:37 AM
"We are not going to lose to State," defensive end Brandon Graham proclaimed Saturday following the team's 46-17 loss at Happy Valley.
"That's just, we're not going to lose to State," he said again, shaking his head. "We're going to work hard. We're going to win."
"Michigan State is a rival game, and I've never lost to Michigan State since I've been here," linebacker John Thompson said. "We're not going in there with a defeatist attitude that Michigan State is a better team."
HailToMichigan;1299061; said:But when Mark Dantonio blames missed tackles and turnovers for his loss this week, that makes him a solid coach who will lead LB to glory.
Sorry....but I'm not letting you off the hook that easy with Mallet.HTM said:Yes, a 6'6" 250 lb quarterback would have been just the solution to our problems.
HailToMichigan;1298918; said:Upsets happen for other reasons"
Win or lose, yes, I will. It'll take more than one game to reverse about forty years of dominance.buckeyesin07;1299065; said:I can't wait to see if you'll still be referring to MSU as "LB" a week from now...
No. RR has adapted his offense to fit his personnel. Again: Run/pass splits. However, I don't see much difference between asking Mallett to run the RR offense and asking RR to coach the pro-style. Why is it assumed that a coach should be able to entirely switch gears and write a completely brand-new playbook that he's never used before otherwise he's a bad coach?A 6'6" 250 lb QB running DickRod's queer offense probably wouldn't have worked.
A 6'6" 250 lb 5* #2 ranked QB running an offense that suits him......like you still for some reason claim DickRod can do......would be a hell of a lot better than the [censored] that's being thrown out on the field for Michigan this year.
So which is it? Either DickRod can't adapt his offense to fit his personnel, or he the big pocket passer would have been a welcome sight for this pathetic offense.
You mean Rodriguez? Yes. After Illinois for example:Didn't he just blame the coaching staff as much as anything else?
Look, you guys are seeing what you want to see here. When we've won he's talked about the players and how proud he is of them and what they did right. When we've lost he's talked about lack of execution. It's just talk. It's not Ralph Friedgen saying, "I wish they were listening to me." It's coachspeak."But it starts with Michigan. We've got to get ourselves right, and it starts with the coaches tomorrow morning."
I thought he was the mastermind behind Shaun King. Surely I wasn't misled by the Michigan fans.No. RR has adapted his offense to fit his personnel. Again: Run/pass splits. However, I don't see much difference between asking Mallett to run the RR offense and asking RR to coach the pro-style. Why is it assumed that a coach should be able to entirely switch gears and write a completely brand-new playbook that he's never used before otherwise he's a bad coach?
His post pretty clearly addressed a quote about Dantonio, unless you were just looking to ignore that to make some other point.You mean Rodriguez? Yes. After Illinois for example
Really? So you don't expect Threet to make bad decisions as a passer, especially with a pass rush closing in?The game really did turn on some fluke plays. Toledo's touchdown came on a pickoff in the endzone. Not a fluke like a crazy bouncing ball or something, but not what you'd expect.
Twice a game apparently, except their miss was even closer (basically an extra point).Lopata missed a 26-yard field goal, how often does that happen?
Except it's about more than just what Michigan brings to the table.It's not "OK", but then again RR was not hired for this year. I'll trade losing to Toledo now if it means we don't have to put up with the slow decline to mediocrity we were experiencing starting around 2004.