• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2007 TSUN News

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
SNIPER26;933864; said:
QB: Draw, maybe Morelli because he has experience but he's an awful QB IMO
WR/TE: Michigan by a little
Click to expand...


Penn State will be bringing pressure, and you have yet to see how Mallet is going to take that. If he handles it well then your receivers will get some touches, if he doesn't and spends the whole day running for his life then whoever has the better receivers won't matter.

Until I see otherwise I will not give a nod to any defensive aspect of of scUM, so saying their d-line is better is pointless. Dixon had his with with running and if your line had been better you would have gotten some penetration through their o-line and had a chance to hit him a few times to make him think twice about running.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;933864; said:
...
QB: Draw, maybe Morelli because he has experience but he's an awful QB IMO
RB: Michigan, despite your love for Mike Hart
WR/TE: Michigan by a little
OL: Michigan
...
Click to expand...

So everyone with any impact on the passing game is as good as or better than what PSU has to offer...

And yet PSU is ranked 23rd in the nation in passing efficiency, and UM is 95th.

Is this due to schedule strength?
Based on what? The vaunted Oregon Ducks who are ranked 84th in total defense?
​
This explains a 72 spot differential in PE ranking out of 119 teams?

Fascinating...
 
Upvote 0
DaddyBigBucks;934471; said:
So everyone with any impact on the passing game is as good as or better than what PSU has to offer...

And yet PSU is ranked 23rd in the nation in passing efficiency, and UM is 95th.


Is this due to schedule strength?
Based on what? The vaunted Oregon Ducks who are ranked 84th in total defense?​
This explains a 72 spot differential in PE ranking out of 119 teams?

Fascinating...
Click to expand...

Ok man, I'll stop posting my opinion ok? Obviously every time I post something that's my opinion you've got some wise-ass joke for it, so fuck it, I'll stop ok? You really would take Williams/Butler/Norwood over Manningham/Arrington/Mathews? I call bullshit
 
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;934481; said:
You really would take Williams/Butler/Norwood over Manningham/Arrington/Mathews? I call bullshit
Click to expand...


Maybe not, but I'll still take PSU over M*ch*g*n...There's more to it and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what they've seen from M*ch*g*n, this year, that makes them think they can win this game...
 
Upvote 0
Saw31 said:
Maybe not, but I'll still take PSU over M*ch*g*n...There's more to it and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what they've seen from M*ch*g*n, this year, that makes them think they can win this game...
Click to expand...
The fact that they lost the first 2 games by a combination of the spread and something fucked up in their minds. Which one was the bigger factor will be figured out against Penn State.

I say they slam the shit out of PSU....but that might just be wishful thinking.
 
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;934481; said:
Ok man, I'll stop posting my opinion ok? Obviously every time I post something that's my opinion you've got some wise-ass joke for it, so fuck it, I'll stop ok? You really would take Williams/Butler/Norwood over Manningham/Arrington/Mathews? I call bullshit
Click to expand...

better watch your tone, kid. you probably should stop, since your opinion has clearly been disproven by those pesky little things called "facts."
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye;934529; said:
better watch your tone, kid. you probably should stop, since your opinion has clearly been disproven by those pesky little things called "facts."
Click to expand...

Because the first two games were clearly an indicator as to how good Michigan actually is. :rolleyes: And Mallett only threw 15 times last game, so clearly the passing yardage/efficiency is going to be sky high. Ohio State's offense has been mediocre the first 3 games, does that automatically mean they're always mediocre? Nope.
 
Upvote 0
Last year, I'd take UM's unit hands down. This year, Mario doesn't look much like Mario.
SNIPER26;934536; said:
Because the first two games were clearly an indicator as to how good Michigan actually is. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
What is it an indicator of then?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;934541; said:
That they played 2 crappy games?
Click to expand...
...and the only non-crappy game was against one of the most inept BCS teams I've ever seen.

I happen to have little faith in PSU's offense, but it's pretty bizarre for you to be complaining about people judging UM on its actual performance.
SNIPER26;934535; said:
Like they did last time?
Click to expand...
So frosh CB King is a good indicator of jr CB King?

We would also have accepted 'That they played 1 crappy game?'
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top