Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gotta go with 2014 squad. We've seen what Urban/Herman can do do a Dantonio defense. Although 2002 OSU was more talented on D than any Sparty team we've seen, I still think there's too many weapons on this offense. Imagine if Miami was running a no huddle spread offense with that talent?
The computers disagree with most everyone here:
http://53eig.ht/1xplhjr
This year's team has the second-highest ELO (behind crazy-dominant 1995 Nebraska).
The 2002 team had several impressive wins against top teams. Except Washington State, they were all nail-biters. The 2014 team had several impressive wins against top teams, and they were all dominant performances. That 2002 team did choose to play a certain style, but that was because it had limitations on offense, especially since Clarett was a bit fragile. I think the 2014 team could play Tresselball and still be very successful. I think there's no way that 2002 team could play the way the 2014 team did.
Three significant advantages that the 2014 team has:
Here's a hypothetical that we probably don't want to think about too much: If Urban Meyer were coaching Miami in 2002 instead of Larry Coker, how do you think that game turns out?
- 2014 has a massive advantage at the QB position. I love Craig Krenzel, but it's not even close.
- The 2014 team would exploit the edges of the 2002 defense. That defense was an all-timer and strong as hell up the middle, but 2014 could do damage against it with outside runs and receivers in the slot. Chris Gamble was great, but there's a reason he had to become a two-way player in the middle of the season. Who's gonna cover Michael Thomas and Jalin Marshall on that team? Dustin Fox? EJ Underwood? Cie Grant?
- Yeah, I'm gonna go there... It's no longer painful for me to admit: 2014's team has a significant coaching advantage. We know all too well what an Urban Meyer-coached team is capable of doing to a Jim Tressel-coached team.
The computers disagree with most everyone here:
http://53eig.ht/1xplhjr
This year's team has the second-highest ELO (behind crazy-dominant 1995 Nebraska).
The 2002 team had several impressive wins against top teams. Except Washington State, they were all nail-biters. The 2014 team had several impressive wins against top teams, and they were all dominant performances. That 2002 team did choose to play a certain style, but that was because it had limitations on offense, especially since Clarett was a bit fragile. I think the 2014 team could play Tresselball and still be very successful. I think there's no way that 2002 team could play the way the 2014 team did.
Three significant advantages that the 2014 team has:
Here's a hypothetical that we probably don't want to think about too much: If Urban Meyer were coaching Miami in 2002 instead of Larry Coker, how do you think that game turns out?
- 2014 has a massive advantage at the QB position. I love Craig Krenzel, but it's not even close.
- The 2014 team would exploit the edges of the 2002 defense. That defense was an all-timer and strong as hell up the middle, but 2014 could do damage against it with outside runs and receivers in the slot. Chris Gamble was great, but there's a reason he had to become a two-way player in the middle of the season. Who's gonna cover Michael Thomas and Jalin Marshall on that team? Dustin Fox? EJ Underwood? Cie Grant?
- Yeah, I'm gonna go there... It's no longer painful for me to admit: 2014's team has a significant coaching advantage. We know all too well what an Urban Meyer-coached team is capable of doing to a Jim Tressel-coached team.