• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

What is your favorite James Bond movie?

Why Sean Connery was chosen as James Bond for Dr. No — and why he stubbornly refused to perform a screen test​

Sean Connery also helped inject wit into Bond

ugLtoM9zkzNUEbSJ5juHSm-650-80.jpg.webp

Sean Connery was not the first choice to play James Bond. To be more accurate, he wasn't everyone's first choice to play the suave spy in Dr. No, the first movie in what would become cinema's most successful franchise.

Indeed, Bond author Ian Fleming wanted David Niven to play his creation. Ironically, Niven did indeed play Bond but in the 1967 spoof Casino Royale. Meanwhile, producer Albert "Cubby" Broccoli liked the idea of Hollywood legend Cary Grant taking the part. After all, Grant was the best man at Broccoli's wedding. However, the actor only wanted to do one movie, which would leave Broccoli with the problem of having to recast the role after Dr. No. Grant also would have been 58, and so thankfully for lovers of Sean Connery, Grant turned down the role.

Another star firmly in the running was Danger Man's Patrick McGoohan. Amazingly McGoohan turned the role down for moral reasons. It's hard to imagine an actor today refusing a part on moral grounds, but Broccoli wrote in his autobiography that the actor couldn't square the part with his religious beliefs. While Terence Young, who directed Dr No., wanted Shakespearean actor Richard Johnson to play Bond.

But eventually, thoughts turned to a certain young Scottish actor...
.
.
.
continued

‘That’s Our Bond!’

What it took to turn a little-known, working-class actor named Sean Connery into the high-living, suave James Bond.​

1a1d7f3122a4255497d48ca750c121a829-dr-no-book.rhorizontal.w1100.jpg

Producer Cubby Broccoli, author Ian Fleming, actor Sean Connery, and producer Harry Saltzman at the Eon production offices before Dr.No began filming.

It took years of trying before a proper film adaptation of a James Bond novel was finally produced, with the release of Dr. No in 1962. Along the way, there were false starts, abandoned suitors, and an author, Ian Fleming, who was very particular about what could be done to his work and by whom. The biggest question of all, of course, was who would play Agent 007; producers Harry Saltzman and Albert “Cubby” Broccoli had come to United Artists with a plan to make a whole series of Bond films, so whoever got the part would have to be able to carry multiple movies. Taschen’s massive new book James Bond. Dr. No, written and edited by Paul Duncan, offers an intriguing and colorful journey into the production of the first James Bond movie. The book is filled with detailed script notes, production memos, and call sheets — not to mention more than a thousand images — that take us behind the scenes of the film. Perhaps the most fascinating story in it, however, concerns how a relatively little-known actor by the name of Sean Connery got the part of Bond. In this exclusive excerpt, Duncan tells the tale of Connery’s casting as well as how director Terence Young took the working-class actor under his wing and schooled him in how to actually play the high-living, suave Bond.

My books,” said Ian Fleming, “tremble on the brink of corn. One has to be very careful.”

United Artists announced the deal with producers Albert “Cubby” Broccoli and Harry Saltzman on June 29. Although Variety reported that either Dr. No or Diamonds Are Forever would be the first James Bond novel to be filmed, the producers wanted to film Ian Fleming’s most recent and most successful novel, Thunderball, the rights to which they had been led to believe would be made available soon. However, United Artists had different ideas. According to company chief David Picker, “Harry and Cubby pushed for Thunderball, but it was clear that since we were only prepared to risk a certain amount of money on these movies, Dr. No was the one to do first. It was the cheapest one to make.”

Four days later Bud Ornstein of United Artists’ London office sent production company EON a £3,000 check as an advance to Wolf Mankowitz to write the script for the first film, Dr. No, which they hoped to begin shooting before the end of the year. Cubby explained, “Harry and I decided that, since Wolf Mankowitz was a fine writer and had acted as the marriage broker in our partnership, he deserved to have a crack at the screenplay.” At the same time, they hired Richard Maibaum to write the second film, Thunderball, and, as per Maibaum’s assignments with Warwick, arranged for him to travel from Hollywood to live in London so he could be near the producers while he worked.

With work on the scripts in progress, Cubby admitted, “We now had the toughest problem of all: finding the actor to play James Bond.”
“Actors are falling over themselves to play Bond,” Harry told the press. “It’s the acting plum of the decade. Everyone’s been after it. Cary Grant, David Niven, Trevor Howard, and James Mason are interested. Hitchcock wanted to buy it for Cary Grant, and Jimmy Woolf tried to buy it for Larry Harvey. But I guess my timing just happened to be right. I’m also thinking about Michael Craig and Patrick McGoohan, but I’d prefer to use an unknown, as we did with Saturday Night and Sunday Morning.”

“Fleming’s physical descriptions of James Bond were very well drawn,” Cubby explained. “Fleming gives Bond’s height as a little over six feet, his weight as around 167 pounds, and his build slim. Furthermore, the various descriptions confirm that Bond possesses ‘dark, rather cruel good looks,’ and that women find him devastatingly irresistible. Well, we had our blueprint, but where was there an actor to fit it?
“I felt that we had to have an unknown actor, not a star; above all, a man you’d believe could be James Bond. Our theory was that if we cast a virtually unknown actor, the public would be more likely to accept him as the character. Also, we wanted to build the actor into the role so that he would grow with it and wouldn’t complain if we wanted him to do several more Bonds. Patrick McGoohan had been suggested [he was starring as secret agent John Drake in the TV series Danger Man], and might have made a fine Bond. But he was strongly religious and was uneasy about sex and violence. James Fox was also put forward, but he, likewise, was reluctant because of strong religious scruples.

“Roger Moore [then starring in American TV show Maverick] had also been touted as a possible Bond. But at that time I thought him slightly too young, perhaps a shade too pretty. He had what we called the ‘Arrow collar’ look: too buttoned-down smart.

“While all the discussions about the casting of Bond were going on, one face kept coming back into my mind. It belonged to an actor I had met briefly a few years before in London. He was Sean Connery, who at that time was making a film with Lana Turner, Another Time, Another Place (1958). He was a handsome, personable guy, projecting a kind of animal virility. He was tall, with a strong physical presence, and there was just the right hint of threat behind that hard smile and faint Scottish burr.

“Back in Hollywood I had arranged to see the only footage available on him, Darby O’Gill and the Little People (1959), at Goldwyn Studios [on June 28, 1961]. I phoned Dana to come down to see the picture. Dana’s reaction was immediate: ‘That’s our Bond!’ She thought he would be absolutely ideal for the role. I knew that her judgment was spot-on. I phoned Harry and told him to run some film on Sean, call his agent, and invite the actor to our office in London to meet us on my return.”

In June 1961, Sean Connery had finished filming the comedy On the Fiddle at Shepperton Studios, where he played a soldier with the strength of five men but the brains of only half of one, and was rehearsing Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina for the BBC with Claire Bloom in the title role. Peter Hunt, the editor of On the Fiddle, remembered, “One night the producer Ben Fisz and myself and a group of people were having dinner in the Polish Club, and Harry Saltzman came into the club with his new wife. We all sat together and that was when Harry said he was going to make this James Bond film and was looking for a James Bond. Ben Fisz suggested that maybe Sean would make a good James Bond. We were well into the film and on the way to dubbing it, so I sent up a couple of reels to Harry’s office.”

Harry remembered looking at several of Connery’s early films. “He was dreadful in most of them, we thought. He had suffered a small but fatal miscasting all the way down the line.”

Harry, Cubby, and Bud Ornstein waited for their potential star. Connery arrived wearing baggy trousers, loafers, and a five o’clock shadow. “Connery walked into our office and had a strength and energy about him, which I found riveting,” Cubby recalled. “Physically, and in his general persona, he was too much of a rough cut to be a replica of Fleming’s upper-class secret agent. This suited us fine, because we were looking to give our 007 a much broader box-office appeal: a sexual athlete who would look great in Savile Row suits but with the lean midriff of a character who starts his day with 20 push-ups. Everything about Connery that day was convincingly James Bond. Harry and I asked him a lot of questions. His answers, in that very appealing Scottish accent of his, were friendly and direct. There was no conceit to him and no false modesty, either. He didn’t come on in the style of a classical actor who thought James Bond was a little too down-market for his talents.

“There was, though, a slight change of tone in him when we got around to talk about specifics: the image we wanted to create and the money he expected to earn. Everybody accepted that, on a strictly limited production budget, big salaries were out. When we explained this to Sean the discussion became very lively. He started hammering the desk, his accent becoming even broader: ‘I want fooking so much or I won’t do the fooking picture! I won’t work for fooking nothing!’ And so forth. It was quite a performance. Privately, I was quite amused by it. And I gather that Sean himself admitted sometime later that it had been a bit of an act. But it all ended in a friendly way. We agreed on his salary, and he walked out happy.”
.
.
.
continued

Just sayin': Interesting stories of the beginning of the James Bond Movies. Like the case in many other movies*, the person that got picked for the lead role went on to become a hit in the role; however, he/she wasn't their first choice choice for the part.

* Apparently Daniel Craig wasn't their first choice for Casino Royale either; it was Hugh Jackman, he declined because he was told he wouldn't have any say in the script. "I just felt at the time that the scripts had become so unbelievable and...they needed to become grittier and real," he told Variety. "I was also worried that between Bond and X-Men, I’d never have time to do different things." However, when Daniel Craig accepted the role afterward, the produces agreed to let him "try and reinvent" Bond.
Upvote 0

LB Riley Pettijohn (Official Thread)

Riley Pettijohn Says He Can “Do A Little Bit Of Everything,” Thinks He Can Get on the Field and Make Plays for Ohio State in Year One​

155533_h.jpg


A typical day for freshman linebacker Riley Pettijohn this spring isn’t for the faint of heart.

The No. 2-rated linebacker in the 2025 recruiting class, Pettijohn often starts his day by waking up early and strolling to Ohio State’s practice facility, the Woody Hayes Athletic Center.

He starts by watching practice film from the previous day, making notes of where he thrived and what he needs to refine going forward. Then he’ll either have practice, or if it’s an off day, he’ll lift weights. When he completes those, he’ll have meetings with Ohio State’s coaching staff, primarily linebackers coach James Laurinaitis, who will offer his input on Pettijohn’s play so far.

“Riley Pettijohn, he has a great feel for the game,” Laurinaitis said. “The burst is there … Any time you have freshmen on the field, you get these lumps of clay you’re excited to form a little bit. The most important thing with young players is that you’re learning a lot.”

And of course, he’s also a student-athlete, so following his football obligations, he heads to the classroom. He’ll end his night with some film study, part two.

“I want to know what I did wrong, what I can improve on and help me learn new installs,” Pettijohn said of what he watches during film.

That may seem like a lot for someone who’s just finished his third month on campus, but Pettijohn came to Ohio State with lofty expectations as a top-45 recruit in the nation, and he has lofty goals for himself in his freshman year.

“Just getting on the field and making plays,” Pettijohn said of what he hopes to accomplish in year one. “I feel like that’s a good expectation for me.”
.
.
.
continued
Upvote 0

Spring Games

Why NCAA Committee Denied Colorado, Syracuse's Request for Spring Game​

Here's the reasoning behind the FBS oversight panel's denial.

The NCAA's FBS oversight committee on Friday denied a waiver request, filed last week by Colorado and Syracuse's football programs, that proposed a joint 11-on-11 spring scrimmage game, according to Chris Vannini of The Athletic.

The waiver request also proposed contact and non-contact practice sessions between the Buffaloes and Orange in the 2025 spring practice period. In an explanation of its denial obtained by Vannini, the NCAA listed two main areas of concern with the request:

Login to view embedded media
"The timing of the request, noting most institutions have already planned their spring practice periods and some are at the end of, or have completed, their spring practice period," the NCAA said.

"The competitive and recruiting advantage gained by the applicant institutions if a waiver was approved to allow these institutions to engage in activities no other institutions are permitted to do. And the potential academic impact associated with student athletes missing class time to participate in spring activities."

However, the committee agreed to further discussions, in a future meeting, that could ultimately lead to joint spring practices in the future. The idea of a joint spring practice and game isn't new, but it quickly picked up steam again after Sanders floated a pro-style alternative to the current format while speaking to reporters last week.
.
.
.
continued
Upvote 0

DB Miles Lockhart (National Champion)

Redshirt Freshman Cornerback Miles Lockhart Becomes First Buckeye to Lose Black Stripe in 2025

155536_h.jpg


Ohio State’s first black stripe removal of 2025 came after the Buckeyes’ seventh practice of the spring on Saturday.

Redshirt freshman cornerback Miles Lockhart became the first Buckeye to shed his black stripe this spring.

Login to view embedded media
A four-star recruit in the 2024 class, Lockhart did not play any snaps as a true freshman.
.
.
.
continued
Upvote 0

Ohio State Men's Ice Hockey (2019 B1G Champions)

Yeah, 8-3 is not a good look, especially to a lower seed
BU was the 2 seed; we were the 3. BU hung around the top 5 most of the year. Not a terrible loss, but I still expected a better showing.

B1G as a whole stunk up the joint yesterday going O-3. The 4 seed pedsters are all that remains. I think we can close the book on the all that "B1G is now the top conference in college hockey" talk.
Upvote 0

CB Richard McNutt (BGSU Defensive Backs Coach)

Login to view embedded media
Former Heisman front-runner at tOSU follows Heisman winner to BGSU.

I guess the title of this thread needs to be changed to reflect his new job but the person who started it has been banned. :slappy:

4 posts in and Milli comes off the top rope on Tibor

:lol:

ahh the good ol days
Upvote 0

Filter

Back
Top