scooter1369;810314; said:He does, but not for PC problems.
Need a diaper changed? IAB is the man to call
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
scooter1369;810314; said:He does, but not for PC problems.
Need a diaper changed? IAB is the man to call
LitlBuck;862588; said:I'm back! Is anyone aware of a good spam filter for the best way to get rid of it? I am running Outlook Express and have Norton Antivirus 2007 but it offers no spam protection. My spam mail wasn't too bad up until a couple weeks ago but it has been on the increase ever since.
Dryden;862619; said:Mozilla Thunderbird has a much better spam filtering system (among its many, better features), FWIW.
Outlook Express is just a big steaming pile ... gives me nothing but headaches at work with its mailbox management system and the 2Gb file size limit in the OS. Either switch to the more full featured Office bundled Outlook, or go with Thunderbird. OE just is not that robust -- it wasn't designed to be.
When you first launch it you will be given the opportunity to set it to your default e-mail client. You can also select default applications from Control Panel -> Add or Remove Programs -> Set Program Access and DefaultsLitlBuck;862753; said:Do you know what it's compatibility is with IE 7.0? (See above five posts previous to this one).
Just launch Thunderbird and go to Tools -> Import. Run this utility three times, once each for Settings, Mail, and Address Books to import everything.LitlBuck;862753; said:Do you know of a good way to export my e-mail addresses from OE to import them into Thunderbird? I assume I will lose all my messages which isn't that big of a deal.
Thunderbird installed everything automatically. Very nice. Much better than OE. Thanks.Dryden;862990; said:Just launch Thunderbird and go to Tools -> Import. Run this utility three times, once each for Settings, Mail, and Address Books to import everything.
Clarity;17895; said:Real-time virus monitoring and prevention:
Spyware Blaster - Real-time spy ware monitoring and detection:
SpywareBlaster
Have not installed this myself. Does come highly recommended. My only hesitation is that I'm not sure I need it. I'm content to let what little spy ware and ad-ware that does get through sit on my machine until AdAware runs. This is because with the HOSTS file correction above, almost nothing gets through, and what does is very benign. On the other hand, anyone who has suffered a major browser hijacking might well feel differently (especially since this software does not run constantly on your system -- meaning it's not a resource drainer), so I have pointed a few folks to this in the past, and heard back very positive things. So I submit it here in case someone needs it (or something similar) in the future. Sometimes it's just nice to know that the weapons are there. Oh, and it's free.
Spyware/adware:
AdAware
Ad-Aware @ Lavasoft - The Original Anti-Spyware Company - Lavasoft
Don't know how else to say it, if you're not running this on a Windows-based PC currently, then you're just asking for problems. After having an antiviral program which is kept up-to-date with virus definitions, I'd say AdAware (which is free and very easy to use) is the second most necessary tool for life on the Internet. I extolled its virtues as far back as two years ago on Bucknuts, and I continue to today over here.
Spybot S&D
http://www.safer-networking.org/
You should run this in concert with AdAware. It's a little different in how it works and what it catches. It will find things that AdAware won't, just as AdAware will find things this doesn't. It too is free and easy to use in Basic mode. I do not recommend using Advanced mode unless you REALLY know what you're doing. I do not, am not confident enough in my limited grasp to make manual and unguided changes to my Windows registry, so I stay out of there.
Virus Protection:
I use Norton AntiVirus for the reasons specified above in the Preventative section. There are a ton of other options, and different people have different preferences. This is just the one I recommend. The problem is that while almost everyone has an antiviral program on their computer, not everyone keeps the virus definitions up to date. If you're going to be on the internet, you have to. Because here's the thing; you're putting everyone else at risk. It's a little like knowing you have viral conjunctivitis (pink eye) and going to an orgy anyway. Catching it yourself is one thing, spreading it to others is something entirely different. Recently the Sasser worm wreaked havoc around the web, spreading from one unprotected computer to another. Many of these computers had antiviral programs that were either out of date, or didn't have real-time protection (as described above). That wasn't why they were exposed though, that was through a known vulnerability in Windows.
SECURITY/MISC
Firewalls:
I'm behind a hardware firewall built in to my router/switch. If you're not behind a hardware firewall, you should probably be behind a software firewall. There's even one built right into Windows XP. As this isn't an area of need for me, I can't speak intelligently about the software end of things. I do know that ZoneAlarm comes highly recommended. I also know most of the antiviral firms also offer firewalls. Norton Internet Security for example includes both a solid software firewall and Norton Antivirus 2004. If you have a need in this area, I recommend hitting the web and doing some reading, and/or perhaps someone on this site with a clue can talk about firewalls a bit and educate us all.
UPDATE: With XP SP2, came a vastly improved Windows Security Center, and a better Firewall. I still can't speak intelligently about software firewalls, but I can say that your system comes with the tools you need to help protect yourself. I would never claim that Microsoft is a forerunner in system security, but some of the recent changes with SP2 have been positive on that front.
Clarity;1167141; said:Four years later, I'm surprised any of my original recommendations are still valid, even if the sentiment and philosophy may be. Thanks for bringing us up to date, Muck. I'll link your post from the top of the first one, if you have no objection.