BuckShot63
Sophmore
Yes, because there is no defense of "emergency" or "necessity" to the NCAA's rules. I believe the reason that the proposed penalty is seemingly light is because fairly overwhelming mitigation exists. I don't believe that a former member of the NCAA's committee on infractions, two NCAA investigators, and an outstanding consulting firm are going to prepare a report and propose sanctions that are far off the mark. They may not have totally hit the bullseye, but I believe that they are close. This also leads me to believe that vacating wins isn't even on the table. It's one thing to mis-gauge the degree of penalty, I'd be floored if they mis-gauged the kind of penalty.OSUScoonie12;1887709; said:Here's a question. After all the smoke clears, the NCAA finds out that Tressel indeed withheld the information because of an FBI investigation and was told by both the FBI and OSU legal to not say anything; can/will the NCAA give any punishment out?
Not saying this is true, or will happen. Just a general question, because i honestly don't know the answer. IMO, the FBI > NCAA in a situation like this, and i would much rather be in trouble with the NCAA then the FBI.
Upvote
0