I was under the impression that McLaurin and Dixon were on one side and Mack and Victor on the other. So Mack would be starting over VictorStarting over McLaurin or Dixon?
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I was under the impression that McLaurin and Dixon were on one side and Mack and Victor on the other. So Mack would be starting over VictorStarting over McLaurin or Dixon?
Yep--then again, he might have two............don't forget Johnnie Dixon.
Here's to hoping Urban has found another dominant WR( in the mold of Michael Thomas). Not just a deep threat, but an all around kid who can move the chains and get jump balls as well
Let's hope so.I really think that even though he was injured on the play that, that play may have been a breakthrough for Mack, he made a tough grab and he was rewarded for it by the refs, Im in the camp that says his stock will be going up.
Mack should be given 2x the opportunities for the play he made... We are big in rewarding people for winning battles so why not do it with playing time? Right now Mack has proven he will go up and get a dang pass, Campbell has proven he can make a play and that goes for Dixon as well. Even though he didn't score I think Mack's catch should earn him the right to be put in a position to make plays over anyone else because he had to go up to get that pass and paid a price for doing it. No one has gone up and got a ball like that since Noah a year prior against OU.
Reward him for his play and maybe that'll get the others to step their game up.
but there's no significant discrepancy from the No. 1 receiver to the No. 6,
there's no significant discrepancy from the No. 1 receiver to the No. 6,
If you have 6 you don't have 1, sorry
tired of the excuses
WR coach isn't getting it done. Everyone in America recruited these kids and they are empty uniforms on the field for OSU.