• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

ttun Shenanigans and Arguments (2016 official thread)

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to this site: http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/umosu/results.htm

100 years ago this off season OSU was behind 0-12-2

One hundred fucking years ago

Another good point of reference is 1951, the year Woody took over.

In that 64 year span OSU is up 36-27-2 (.57%)

The distant history which they have to cling to for their 10 game lead gets more pathetic and laughable every year.
 
Upvote 0
I like to use the starting point of when Ohio State joined the Big Ten:



I forget the years, exactly, but Michigan was a founding member of the conference, but left. Soon after that, Ohio State joined, and the Big Ten wouldn't let Ohio State play Michigan. ("They're deserters! F them!" the Big Ten commissioner might have said.) So then Michigan rejoined a few years later. I know that there were a couple of years when Ohio State didn't play Michigan before they finally won a game.

I thought it was a couple of years ago, but I know we recently took the lead in the in-conference record. Does that include 2010? Either way, I'll assume kujirakira is correct.

I know that. My point is that Michigan cannot "officially" claim multiple of their claimed national championships yet they do anyway. As such, so long as they do disregard what the NCAA chooses to recognize, I see no problem (personally) in also disregarding the vacated victories in 2010.

47-46-4 in-conference doesn't include vacated wins.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top