• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

ttun Shenanigans and Arguments (2016 official thread)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
LordJeffBuck said:
So from 1920 to date, Ohio State leads the series 47-45-4 (.510 winning percentage).

A better starting point is 1919, the Buckeyes' first win in The Game. Before then (1897 to 1918), Ohio State was 0-13-2 (.067 winning percentage). Since then (1919 to 2015), Ohio State is 48-45-4 (.515 winning percentage).

Here's a LINK to the results of every game in the series.
Click to expand...

I like to use the starting point of when Ohio State joined the Big Ten:

kujirakira said:
As of this year we have a winning record against them in-conference
47-46-4
Click to expand...

I forget the years, exactly, but Michigan was a founding member of the conference, but left. Soon after that, Ohio State joined, and the Big Ten wouldn't let Ohio State play Michigan. ("They're deserters! F them!" the Big Ten commissioner might have said.) So then Michigan rejoined a few years later. I know that there were a couple of years when Ohio State didn't play Michigan before they finally won a game.

I thought it was a couple of years ago, but I know we recently took the lead in the in-conference record. Does that include 2010? Either way, I'll assume kujirakira is correct.
 
Upvote 0
I believe Onwenu removed the UM thing because he was paying tribute to a fallen friend. That's what I read. But hey, depending on what time of the day it is this class is either imploding or going to be amazing (per UM fans of course.)
 
Upvote 0
WolverineMike said:
I believe Onwenu removed the UM thing because he was paying tribute to a fallen friend. That's what I read. But hey, depending on what time of the day it is this class is either imploding or going to be amazing (per UM fans of course.)
Click to expand...
You also read that Harbaugh climbed a tree to save a kitten that was on fire.
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
I thought it was a couple of years ago, but I know we recently took the lead in the in-conference record. Does that include 2010? Either way, I'll assume kujirakira is correct.
Click to expand...

I don't know if their numbers include 2010, but as long as UM continues to "count" MULTIPLE national championships that the NCAA doesn't recognize, I know I will sure count 2010.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow said:
Michigan lost those games, officially. OSU did not officially win.
Click to expand...

I know that. My point is that Michigan cannot "officially" claim multiple of their claimed national championships yet they do anyway. As such, so long as they do disregard what the NCAA chooses to recognize, I see no problem (personally) in also disregarding the vacated victories in 2010.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top