One thing I'd note is that "commitments" at this point aren't real, and that we almost certainly have more late poaching potential than the middle-tier programs that are "stealing" kids from us with big bags right now. Let's see if maybe there's a three-part strategy to: (1) Hold off on matching big bags and having to set the market and defend our "commits" all year long (and maybe annoying current, proven players before they're well into and focused on the season); See what we can get for now without breaking the bank with decent but not market setting NIL, the brand, promises of development, culture, etc.; and (3) Fill in deficiencies later by matching or exceeding the bags of "committed" kids we like and who we know like us (like Womack if he "commits" to Auburn soon) right before the signing deadline and not having to have others drive up the price more while they're committed to us but unsigned. This would also have the advantage of getting more film on the prospects and shortening the window for injury risk.
I haven't seen indications that OSU plans to focus mainly on the portal to the detriment of high-school recruiting, and I do think that, with fairly rare exceptions for true freaks at comparatively easily projectable positions for which sheer talent/athleticism is a bigger determinant of success (RB, WR, CB, DE, and maybe DT), and where the wallets should open up early from time to time, I'd prefer that they focus the biggest bags on retaining proven talent or acquiring a handful of impact portal guys like Downs, Klare, Judkins, etc.
Put another, way, I'm in "trust the coaches" mode, at least for now.
Pantoni's comments don't read like they are strategically gaming the system and trying to re-swoop anybody at the end.
He and Birm have both thrown out numbers publicly saying that OSU is coming in 30-50% lighter than others for guys that the coaches are investing time and energy into pursuing (they want them, they fit the culture and they are good players). Reads/sounds like frustration to me.
This isn't about trusting the coaches imo. This is about the AD and NIL. I think Day and co are doing the best with what they can do but you can't invest in the current roster very long in a 4 year cycle business and you can't be paying 50% below market wages in any endeavor if you want the top end talent.
Things move fast, last years NC is a lagging indicator of Day's roster building pre 2024, it's no indication that he can do it going forward if he is somehow being hamstrung by the NIL cash.
If he isn't actually hamstrung by the AD/NIL and this is a conscious decision and go forward strategy, well then it's certainly a bold one. Let's see how it works out for him Cotton.
Upvote
0