TAKE/COUNTER-TAKE: OHIO STATE SHOULD PRIORITIZE RECRUITING IN-STATE PROSPECTS
There wouldn't seem to be much to debate about regarding Ohio State's current recruiting successes.
While already maintaining a stranglehold on the No. 1 recruiting class in the 2021 cycle, provided Ryan Day and his staff finish strong, the Buckeyes could make a run at the best class in the modern recruiting era. That isn't hyperbole, either. They hold 19 commitments, and by securing the top remaining targets on their board, they'd top Florida's 2010 class, which holds the crown.
But we're tackling a long-debated recruiting question anyway. Should the Buckeyes prioritize recruiting prospects from Ohio?
TAKE: OHIO STATE SHOULD PRIORITIZE IN-STATE PROSPECTS
Colin Hass-Hill: My name isn’t Jim Tressel. I’m not here to advocate that Mark Pantoni enters his quarantine bunker, pulls up the 247Sports composite rankings on his laptop, click on the Ohio rankings, then copy and paste the 25 best players in state onto Ohio State’s recruiting board.
Let’s be realistic. Ohio State doesn’t become Ohio State without thriving nationally on the trail. Dwayne Haskins, Jeff Okudah, Chase Young, J.T. Barrett, the Bosa brothers, Justin Fields, TreVeyon Henderson, Chris Olave and Raekwon McMillan just popped their heads in here to say hello.
But, for a multitude of reasons that I’m sure my friend and colleague Kevin Harrish doesn’t want you to believe, it’s important for the Buckeyes to prioritize Ohio-based prospects in recruiting.
For Ohio State, Ohio has to be the bedrock. The foundation upon what everything is built.
“It will continue to be our first priority to recruit Ohio football players,” Ryan Day said at his introductory press conference as the Buckeyes head coach.
Of course, that’s the cheapest way for any newly hired coach anywhere to get applause from the local fans. Chris Holtmann made a similar move three years ago, saying the new basketball staff was working to “close the borders and dominate the state of Ohio in recruiting.” But it also matters that Day executes those words.
.
.
.
COUNTER-TAKE: OHIO STATE SHOULD NOT PRIORITIZE IN-STATE PROSPECTS
Kevin Harrish: I’m not anti-Ohio, but I am pro-winning. And I boldly believe that the best way to win is to collect the best players. My argument is simply that Buckeyes should do that.
When it comes to recruiting, signing the most talented players in the country should be Ohio State’s only concern. It simply should not matter where those players come from. Priority should be given to the better player, regardless of home state.
It’s a heartwarming story every time a local kid gets to suit up in the Scarlet and Gray after dreaming of playing for the Buckeyes as a kid, but the reality is Ohio State isn’t the Make-A-Wish Foundation, it’s a program that expects to compete for a national title every season, and a national recruiting approach is a tried-and-true way to make that happen.
If you’d like proof, look at Alabama, which has been the most dominant program of the last decade because of its national recruiting approach.
The Crimson Tide signed the nation’s best class every single season for seven years between 2011 and 2017 and won four national titles with two runner-up finishes during that span. They also signed no more than eight prospects from their home class in each recruiting class. During that same span, Ohio State signed nine or more Ohioans in every single class, never had the nation’s highest-rated recruiting class and won a single national title.
Now, the obvious difference is that Ohio is a more populous state that produces more elite football talent. But the fact remains that Alabama does not tie itself to in-state loyalties and has found unprecedented success as a result.
And we can’t pretend like Ohio State hasn’t already benefitted from a national recruiting approach. Taking the past 10 classes that had at least three years to develop (I.e. from 2008 to 2017), Ohio State signed 121 players from Ohio and 119 from elsewhere – a near-even split. But out of those classes, there were more than twice times as many All-Americans from other states (13) as there were from Ohio (6), and twice as many first-round picks, as well.
Entire article:
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio...ould-prioritize-recruiting-in-state-prospects
The Crimson Tide signed the nation’s best class every single season for seven years between 2011 and 2017 and won four national titles with two runner-up finishes during that span. They also signed no more than eight prospects from their home class in each recruiting class. During that same span, Ohio State signed nine or more Ohioans in every single class, never had the nation’s highest-rated recruiting class and won a single national title.
I vote for the "Alabama Model", you got to nationwide and take the best players you can get.