Buckeye86
I do not choose to discuss it
I got the sense watching (and I believe put in a thread here at the time) that the Penn State coordinators were outmatched. I also saw some of the social media x and o gurus say that Penn State’s D coordinator does a bunch of risky stuff hoping to get a big play, but leaving them fundamentally unsound and vulnerable, which obviously didn’t work out well for them against a basic running attack that wasn’t trying to do anything fancy in UM.Definitely don't agree with their logic.
Sure, Penn State's D was on the field for a lot of plays, but that didn't make the game seem more lopsided than it was. The game was just that, lopsided.
If anything, their D made the game less lopsided with the pick 6 before half. Take that away & it's even uglier.
Not to mention, after Penn State was leading at the half, TTUN's three TD drives in the second half were for a total of 11 plays (4, 1, & 6).
Point being, their analysis almost never factors in deficient schemes or coaching, either, which was seemingly a big factor against UM and something they are ignoring in their analysis of this game.
Again, I like what they do and it definitely has value—which is nice it’s predicting a fairly comfortable win—I just think they ignore certain factors. It makes sense for them to do that, though. Being an expert on all factors for every game would be nearly impossible. Talking very specifically about the numbers their model pops out each week allows them to add value to the coverage of all the big games.
Even with that said, their conclusion was that their model doesn’t predict Ohio State pushing PSU to the breaking point of a blowout like UM did. Well, with the factors they ignored (bad or at least vulnerable coaching/scheme and bad QB play) here’s hoping we do see that breaking point.
Last edited:
Upvote
0