Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I really like some form of the dime against Cal. I hope to see more dime than nickel formations on defense. Dime makes the most sense to me for 2 reasons: Our weakest unit on D is in the middle and they throw a TON. I'd like to see 4 down lineman most of the game with Shazier by himself covering most of the true middle/center. That gives you 6 guys in the secondary to rotate around as needed. I just dont see the need for Perry or Grant much in this game. I'll put it this way - I see Powell, Pitt Brown, and/or Bell getting more playing time than Perry or Grant. I don't see the point in 3 down lineman very often either. Bring one of the safeties or star guys up to help out Shazier when we expect the run. Dare them to keep throwing it while the big uglies in the trench create pressure and when we go to nickel I'd like to see us use Shazier and/or Roby to blitz. That's my armchair plan anyway, LOL. I am just very confident in our personel being able to handle this offense.
tOSU is only 27th in rushing this year so far, and this needs to be fixed.With most of their starting line out, I have a feeling Hall and Smith are going to have field days on the ground.
I really like some form of the dime against Cal. I hope to see more dime than nickel formations on defense.
Regarding Cal's passing game he said that the majority of the time the ball is thrown in under two seconds, which makes it difficult to get a pass rush on the quarterback.
tOSU is only 27th in rushing this year so far, and this needs to be fixed.
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/23
There was a lot of talk about everyone being back so the running game would be unstoppable.
Maybe we just need Hyde and Hall in at the same time ... running back and H back.
tOSU is only 27th in rushing this year so far, and this needs to be fixed.
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/23
There was a lot of talk about everyone being back so the running game would be unstoppable.
Maybe we just need Hyde and Hall in at the same time ... running back and H back.
tOSU is only 27th in rushing this year so far, and this needs to be fixed.
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/23
There was a lot of talk about everyone being back so the running game would be unstoppable.
Maybe we just need Hyde and Hall in at the same time ... running back and H back.
FIFYRight now, C. Grant is a liability in pass coverage so I don't see him playing at all in this game. And also Cal's running game is weak and doesn't pose much of a threat.
I consider that pretty damn good when considering Braxton only has 82yards and our top RB hasn't played yet. We're getting production on the ground elsewhere, which will only increase once Carlos comes back. What were you expecting?
Yeah, then we can schedule Georgia now and they can suck in 10-12 years once we get around to actually playing them. Duh U was at the pinnacle of college football when we schedule them and they were mediocre once we actually played them. Cal was a solid team when we scheduled them and they're so-so at best right now. Va Tech was a top-notch team when we scheduled them, and they're not much right now. Scheduling UGA or GT woud be just a much hit-or-miss...My point is that there are real marquee games that can be played and still fit the recruiting purpose. This was supposed to have been a "marquee" series.
If you step back and look at the "marquee" series from 2005 to 2023; one of those things is not like the others, and it wasn't that hard to see it would turn out that way