Jeffcat;849086; said:this is where i am willing to disagree to an extent. i do not think GPA should be valued more than standardized testing but the testing is the make or break factor in their decision making. you can look amazing but if your ACT is low it is direct blow to the chin in your application. i disagree with the idea of studying. people frequently study ACT practice tests and study for the ACT as well but i would rather have the person that is willing to study for their tests towards their GPA(given the curriculum is solid) because it exemplifies the qualities of that student as a student and especially one of capability by being a hard working student in and out of the classroom to go out and learn the material and know it. to each his own i guess.
The arguments against the GMAT for the MBA admissions assessment process has been growing for years. My university has a full seat on the GMAC Council and we are in the fifth year of testing an alternative admissions test for GMAC. Our test has predicted student performance better than the GMAT but both test scores predict performance pretty well.
That said, we rely heavily on the personal interview as well. One of our female students has just returned from her exchange at London Business School, where she did very well. Her GMAT would not have met their or our admission criteria but in the personal interview, all of the assessors felt that she would make it. She graduated near the top of her class.
So, I think that answer is that business schools, at least at MBA level, use many assessment tools and use all of these, including the standardized GMAT test, to make their admission decisions.
Upvote
0