Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Frankly, I'm embarrassed I'd never thought of "Joobs" before.
Read the posts about people who were actually involved. They said there was nothing negative if they chose not to participate. This is coming from people who actually were in the band. Including ones who said they chose not to participate.
Not disputing that, but the social pressure to go along with others is still present in the decision making process. I'm thinking of the now illegal Milgram studies on conformity.
Yeah, I read those too. Pretty persuasive.
This has the feel of a culture that made one kid feel uncomfortable, who passed it on to mom, who threw a fit - and university lawyers saw a Title IX suit coming, so they recommended cleaning house.
Yeah, I read those too. Pretty persuasive.
This has the feel of a culture that made one kid feel uncomfortable, who passed it on to mom, who threw a fit - and university lawyers saw a Title IX suit coming, so they recommended cleaning house.
This, on the other hand, is the problem with this whole mess. Its playing the Puritanical ideal on one hand, while allowing that kids will be kids. Let me give you a heads up, if there were legitimately bad things going on, I mean like cut and dry felonies, it doesn't matter a whole heck of a lot what was in plain sight or not. But your argument here is saying the kids have a responsibility to give the adults plausible deniability?
From what I've read (albeit on interweb forums), he has actually cut some of the shananigans out. So I'm not sure if I would say he increased the legal liability, but just the combination of the long-standing activities of the band, combined with one person telling daddy, which just happened to fall under his reign. But A) that's assuming the interwebs are reliable (so let's assume that as fact), and B) he obviously could have done more to curtail the risk of legal liability, but I don't know if he himself increased it.Agree, yet in doing so opened up a potential legal [Mark May]storm for Ohio State in terms of Title IX, civil liability etc. We can talk all we want to about the pussification of 'merica, but that wasn't the relevant discussion in Bricker Hall. It was about ending this now, and shutting off our legal liability, legal liability that Mr. Waters had unfortunately increased immeasurably through his actions and inactions.
Yeah, I read those too. Pretty persuasive.
This has the feel of a culture that made one kid feel uncomfortable, who passed it on to mom, who threw a fit - and university lawyers saw a Title IX suit coming, so they recommended cleaning house.
This whole controversy has got to be the stupidest thing I ever heard of, and I hope the petition thing does the trick. Since there's only six weeks left before the university has to field a band, it wouldn't hurt if the entire band stood up as a unit. Solidarity never hurts.Oh, and changing clothes on the bus is an issue? Seriously? Here's your choices:
1. Wear shorts and a t-shirt and voluntarily quick change in front of your peers before stepping off the bus.
2. Wear your button-up wool uniform for the 4+ hour crowded bus trip to East Lansing and be proud you were modest when you died from heat stroke.
Totally agree on the spellingThis. I would have spelled it Jewbs though, just to go that extra mile.