Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Title IX doesn't cover just equal opportunity in sports. It's within the United States Education Amendments Act of 1972...participation in sports is just a portion of it.I have one question though. WTF does any of this have to do with Title IX? I keep hearing that Title IX is involved in the investigation but as far as I understand it Title IX is all about the equal trreatment of genders in sports. Not weather or not sexual nicknames or hazing are sexual harassment epecially when the issue seems to apply equally to all genders in this case.
I get your point, but in JOOBS own words "it was not until this report was published" that she felt sexualized.Agree with all you say here except blaming the media. They simply printed what the OSU Compliance listed as charges. Being PC seems to lead some to believe their actions are above reproach.
...or to sell more papers, increase viewership, gain listeners.And as we know, media has never spun anything to push an agenda.
Exactly. The BD appears to have been a victim of circumstance. Adhere to the rules strictly and you run the risk of a stale environment. Bend the rules and you run the risk of getting the axe.It's also a bit of a catch 22, it seems- if you don't supervise students while they do things, someone gets hurt and the university gets sued. If you do supervise them, there's a seemingly still under development protocol for how to respond without getting yourself in hot water.
And as we know, media has never spun anything to push an agenda.
How do we do that without over reacting? For starters you react to evidence of actual harm, not complaints from an offended parent.
How is the media to blame for an investigation and report conducted and issued by the university -- I'm not sure what they even could have spun here? The report was pretty straightforward, I think.
It's not like the media is out chasing down disgruntled former members and printing hit pieces on Waters.
Actually they are. I got a couple of requests from the media because I replied once on their story that this had been happening long before Waters was on. They wanted me to find people who had issues with this. They didn't care that I had people who said there was nothing out of ordinary occurring here that you wouldn't find in any other organization.
None of it was forced on them.
Except social pressure and when dealing with college students, especially freshmen, that's a powerful inducement.