Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
buckeyebri;2167598; said:My point was there should be standard penalties via the NCAA for public infractions. The NCAA has an opportunity to actually do something that makes sense and takes the punishment scenario out of the coaches hands and make it even across the board. That being said Coaches should have the ability to do more if they choose.
I have no problem with Coach Meyer putting his personal stamp on the program, albeit it seems awful extreme for such a minor offense for these two players.
Oh8ch;2167600; said:I am glad the hammer came down. Public urination is a gateway crime.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ohio-teddy-bear-lover-678234
JimsSweaterVest;2167778; said:So Brandon Spikes tries to gouge out an opposing player's eyes, and he gets suspended for one quarter of one game. But Stoneburner and Mewhort get crucified for a little pee-and-run? Give me a break...
HorseshoeFetish;2167694; said:I have to go with JLB here...are you kidding? The fact that you can even put NCAA and the phrase even across the board in the same paragraph wishing they were capable of doing so astounds me. You might as well ask for congress to step in and make a judgement.
JimsSweaterVest;2167778; said:So Brandon Spikes tries to gouge out an opposing player's eyes, and he gets suspended for one quarter of one game. But Stoneburner and Mewhort get crucified for a little pee-and-run? Give me a break...
buckeyebri;2167791; said:So you are saying it would really be that hard for someone to write a sensible rule book? Yeah, we all feel the NCAA screwed us while they let others slide. But, sheesh cone on. How hard is it for example to do something like this....
Shouldn't that really be the point of the NCAA to make things even across the board for all players and all teams? [censored] poor leadership doesn't have to be the rule of the day with the NCAA or Congress...
- First Misdemeanor - 1 game
- Second Misdemeanor - 3 games
- Third Misdemeanor - 1 full season
buckeyebri;2167791; said:So you are saying it would really be that hard for someone to write a sensible rule book? Yeah, we all feel the NCAA screwed us while they let others slide. But, sheesh cone on. How hard is it for example to do something like this....
Shouldn't that really be the point of the NCAA to make things even across the board for all players and all teams? [censored] poor leadership doesn't have to be the rule of the day with the NCAA or Congress...
- First Misdemeanor - 1 game
- Second Misdemeanor - 3 games
- Third Misdemeanor - 1 full season
buckeyebri;2167598; said:My point was there should be standard penalties via the NCAA for public infractions. The NCAA has an opportunity to actually do something that makes sense and takes the punishment scenario out of the coaches hands and make it even across the board. That being said Coaches should have the ability to do more if they choose.
I have no problem with Coach Meyer putting his personal stamp on the program, albeit it seems awful extreme for such a minor offense for these two players.
buckeyebri;2167791; said:So you are saying it would really be that hard for someone to write a sensible rule book? Yeah, we all feel the NCAA screwed us while they let others slide. But, sheesh cone on. How hard is it for example to do something like this....
Shouldn't that really be the point of the NCAA to make things even across the board for all players and all teams? [censored] poor leadership doesn't have to be the rule of the day with the NCAA or Congress...
- First Misdemeanor - 1 game
- Second Misdemeanor - 3 games
- Third Misdemeanor - 1 full season
buckeyebri;2167932; said:All supposed examples of a system aside, what I am advocating for is a fair, and yes quick, process for all players and schools that removes the ambiguity of the current "whatever coach decides" is the law process that we currently have. A process that IMHO it is unfair to the student athlete at any school due to the nature of the fact that it is inconsistent and vague.
Ryan36_1;2167952; said:So it would be fair to the students to have someone evaluate their actions from the other side of the country based on a pre-written rulebook who has no facts on the case rather than the coaching staff who can evaluate the entire situation?
Does the current solution lead to favoritism? Of course it does, even the most pious of coaches will treat a transgression of the starting QB differently than one of the backup long-snapper. And yes, some coaches sure in the hell will put W-L record ahead of teaching a young adult a life lesson. But guess what that's life.
Your suggestion is to treat the kid who jaywalks the same as the kid who has failed multiple team drug tests and just got busted for possession. Or punish kid A twice as much as kid B for the same transgression because the transgression is a class A misdemeanor in one state and a level 6 felony in another.
And if you think that a standard NCAA guidelines for convicted crimes is going to stop coaches from applying justice differently for key players or manipulating situations, then PM me for some business deals I think you'd be perfect to invest in.
Bladder control exercises.. but this should be taught by a woman.. women are much better at it.. and ONLY a woman can stop in the middle of a pee... males are incapableJBaney45;2167970; said:And to be fair..there are other forms of punishment besides ones that are obvious to fans and the media. I think a little extra time with Marotti could be a more then effective solution to a good number of disciplinary issues.