buxfan4life
The future's so bright, I've gotta wear... shades.
Didn't find a Syracuse BBall thread (besides game threads and the Fine situation.)
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basket...asketball_investigation_drug_violation_030512
Looks like Boeheim doesn't know much about what goes on "under his watch".
The article goes on to explain what MIGHT happen if the NCAA does actually decided to rule on this (LOIC for being a "Willful Violator"), but since there are no free tattoos involved, I don't think this goes anywhere.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basket...asketball_investigation_drug_violation_030512
SYRACUSE, N.Y. ? During a decade in which Syracuse basketball reached the pinnacle of national prominence, the program was awash in positive drug tests and, in many cases, failed to adhere to its internal drug policy while playing ineligible players, Yahoo! Sports has learned.
Over the course of a three-month investigation, four sources with intimate knowledge of the Syracuse men?s basketball program told Yahoo! Sports at least 10 players since 2001 have tested positive for a banned recreational substance or substances. The sources said all 10 of those players were allowed to practice and play at times when they should have been suspended by the athletic department, including instances when some players may not have known of their own ineligibility. The four sources said Syracuse violated its drug policy in at least two areas: failing to properly count positive tests; and playing ineligible players after they should have been subject to suspension.
con't...
Looks like Boeheim doesn't know much about what goes on "under his watch".
The NCAA declined immediate comment when reached by Yahoo! Sports Monday. Boeheim also declined comment.
?I don?t know anything about it,? Boeheim said. ?I would not comment on anything like that. Good luck with your story.?
Asked if he had any knowledge of an NCAA investigation, Boeheim again declined comment.
?Obviously, I?m not going to talk about anything at all,? he said.
The article goes on to explain what MIGHT happen if the NCAA does actually decided to rule on this (LOIC for being a "Willful Violator"), but since there are no free tattoos involved, I don't think this goes anywhere.