• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Somebody said it out loud

Carmen Ohio

All-American
From Pete Futiak, College Football News

Virginia didn’t come into the season expecting to win the ACC title, but is was supposed to be a player in the conference race thanks to a decent talent base, a rising coaching staff, and a nice upside overall. At the very least, this was expected to be an almost sure-thing bowl team.

Things haven’t quite worked out as planned for the Cavaliers, starting out 2-1 with a win over BYU before overcoming the 59-10 loss to Oregon with a pasting of VMI. After the victory, Virginia has lost six straight.

Clemson, like Oregon, beat Virginia 59-10. Ball State put 48 up on the board in a blowout victory, and Duke, Georgia Tech and Pitt all won rather easily. At the moment, the 2-7 Cavaliers are 102nd in the nation in scoring, 98th in scoring defense, and they’re in dead last in the Coastal by two games. This is also the only team in the 14-team ACC that’s no longer eligible for a bowl appearance, and it’s the only one with more than five losses.

So why, exactly, in hindsight, was Oregon’s win at Virginia on September 7th so great that it meant moving Ohio State out of the No. 2 spot?

What, exactly, did Ohio State do to not only be out of the top two, but out of the national title picture entirely now without a lot of help?

I’ve been openly anti-2013 Buckeye from the start of this season. I wasn’t sold on the defensive front seven, I think the secondary is overblown, and I think the team is still a year or so away from the talent to really kick in, but that’s an opinion. The fact is that on September 6th, Ohio State was ranked second in the Coaches’ Poll – and the AP poll, but that’s irrelevant – hosted a San Diego State team that, unlike Virginia, will end up in a bowl, and won 42-7. And for that, the Buckeyes dropped to No. 3 on September 8th.

On some level, this should be applauded. If you really believe that Oregon is the second-best team in America, and Florida State is third, or vice versa, then that’s the way you should vote - it would be nice if the polls were able to fluctuate and weren’t so stuck in their preseason beliefs. However, no team has ever started out the season No. 2 and dropped down to four while remaining unbeaten in November.

I want to know exactly what Oregon has shown voters that Ohio State hasn’t.

The Ducks started out the season with dominant victories over Nicholls State, Virginia, Tennessee, California and Colorado. None of those five teams will end up in a bowl game, Virginia is currently the worst team in the ACC, California is the worst team in the Pac-12, and Colorado is second-worst. Tennessee is fine, but as we’ve seen, it’s flaky, and it’s going to end up with a losing record.

If you’re not going to give any credit now to Ohio State for beating Northwestern in Evanston, then you have to stop giving any love to Oregon for beating Washington, who was on a three-game losing streak before beating Cal.

Yes, the Duck win over UCLA was strong, but was it any better than Ohio State beating Wisconsin? Absolutely not.

In all, so far, Oregon has beaten two teams – Washington and UCLA – that will end up in a bowl, while Ohio State has beaten four – San Diego State, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Iowa – and possibly five with Buffalo, and six if you want to count Penn State, who’d be bowl eligible if the program didn’t have culture issues. That means, but the end of the season, if both Oregon and Ohio State finish 13-0, the Buckeyes will end up with at least eight wins over teams that will end up with six wins or more. Oregon isn’t going to finish with more than seven.

At the moment - until Oregon plays Stanford Arizona and Oregon State - there’s an argument for Florida State, with a dominant win over a top five-caliber Clemson team at Clemson and a stomping of an unbeaten Miami squad, but again, I ask, Coaches’ Poll voters, what, exactly, has Ohio State done to drop so far to the No. 2 spot after Week 2?
 
Let's tell it like it is.
It's the politics of promoting by ESPiN and CBS.
ESPiN is pushing the SEC and Pac12 and ACC.
CBS is promoting the SEC.
When 2 of the biggest media networks are promoting their partners, it will be very hard for any Big Ten team to get it's due respect. This will not change any time soon.
(Urban will play the "no respect" card in whatever Bowl game we land in. :pissed:Urban likes an "angry" team.)
 
Upvote 0
From Pete Futiak, College Football News

Virginia didn’t come into the season expecting to win the ACC title, but is was supposed to be a player in the conference race thanks to a decent talent base, a rising coaching staff, and a nice upside overall. At the very least, this was expected to be an almost sure-thing bowl team.

Things haven’t quite worked out as planned for the Cavaliers, starting out 2-1 with a win over BYU before overcoming the 59-10 loss to Oregon with a pasting of VMI. After the victory, Virginia has lost six straight.

Clemson, like Oregon, beat Virginia 59-10. Ball State put 48 up on the board in a blowout victory, and Duke, Georgia Tech and Pitt all won rather easily. At the moment, the 2-7 Cavaliers are 102nd in the nation in scoring, 98th in scoring defense, and they’re in dead last in the Coastal by two games. This is also the only team in the 14-team ACC that’s no longer eligible for a bowl appearance, and it’s the only one with more than five losses.

So why, exactly, in hindsight, was Oregon’s win at Virginia on September 7th so great that it meant moving Ohio State out of the No. 2 spot?

What, exactly, did Ohio State do to not only be out of the top two, but out of the national title picture entirely now without a lot of help?

I’ve been openly anti-2013 Buckeye from the start of this season. I wasn’t sold on the defensive front seven, I think the secondary is overblown, and I think the team is still a year or so away from the talent to really kick in, but that’s an opinion. The fact is that on September 6th, Ohio State was ranked second in the Coaches’ Poll – and the AP poll, but that’s irrelevant – hosted a San Diego State team that, unlike Virginia, will end up in a bowl, and won 42-7. And for that, the Buckeyes dropped to No. 3 on September 8th.

On some level, this should be applauded. If you really believe that Oregon is the second-best team in America, and Florida State is third, or vice versa, then that’s the way you should vote - it would be nice if the polls were able to fluctuate and weren’t so stuck in their preseason beliefs. However, no team has ever started out the season No. 2 and dropped down to four while remaining unbeaten in November.

I want to know exactly what Oregon has shown voters that Ohio State hasn’t.

The Ducks started out the season with dominant victories over Nicholls State, Virginia, Tennessee, California and Colorado. None of those five teams will end up in a bowl game, Virginia is currently the worst team in the ACC, California is the worst team in the Pac-12, and Colorado is second-worst. Tennessee is fine, but as we’ve seen, it’s flaky, and it’s going to end up with a losing record.

If you’re not going to give any credit now to Ohio State for beating Northwestern in Evanston, then you have to stop giving any love to Oregon for beating Washington, who was on a three-game losing streak before beating Cal.

Yes, the Duck win over UCLA was strong, but was it any better than Ohio State beating Wisconsin? Absolutely not.

In all, so far, Oregon has beaten two teams – Washington and UCLA – that will end up in a bowl, while Ohio State has beaten four – San Diego State, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Iowa – and possibly five with Buffalo, and six if you want to count Penn State, who’d be bowl eligible if the program didn’t have culture issues. That means, but the end of the season, if both Oregon and Ohio State finish 13-0, the Buckeyes will end up with at least eight wins over teams that will end up with six wins or more. Oregon isn’t going to finish with more than seven.

At the moment - until Oregon plays Stanford Arizona and Oregon State - there’s an argument for Florida State, with a dominant win over a top five-caliber Clemson team at Clemson and a stomping of an unbeaten Miami squad, but again, I ask, Coaches’ Poll voters, what, exactly, has Ohio State done to drop so far to the No. 2 spot after Week 2?

Great article by Pete Futiak! So what has Oregon shown voters that Ohio State hasn't? How to lose, of course.

GO BUCKS!!!!! :urban2:
 
Upvote 0
What you are seeing is the media controlling the narrative. They were the ones calling our schedule weak and our defense bad. And now that they have milked that discussion for all it is worth, they are now shifting to a "why doesn't anyone respect Ohio State" position, so that they can generate more hits again. Same thing that political news sources do, except with sports. They make the news, and no longer report it.
 
Upvote 0
Let's tell it like it is.
It's the politics of promoting by ESPiN and CBS.
ESPiN is pushing the SEC and Pac12 and ACC.
CBS is promoting the SEC.
When 2 of the biggest media networks are promoting their partners, it will be very hard for any Big Ten team to get it's due respect. This will not change any time soon.
(Urban will play the "no respect" card in whatever Bowl game we land in. :pissed:Urban likes an "angry" team.)

Don't forget Fox and the PAC 12
 
Upvote 0
What you are seeing is the media controlling the narrative. They were the ones calling our schedule weak and our defense bad. And now that they have milked that discussion for all it is worth, they are now shifting to a "why doesn't anyone respect Ohio State" position, so that they can generate more hits again. Same thing that political news sources do, except with sports. They make the news, and no longer report it.
I LOL at all the use of the word "narrative" on this board. Someone chided the dipshits at BWI for using the same bullshit word. Yet it's used often here.

Here's a simple thought. Just watch the Buckeyes win football games and worry less about what ANYBODY says about it...media or otherwise.
 
Upvote 0
I LOL at all the use of the word "narrative" on this board. Someone chided the dip[Mark May]s at BWI for using the same bull[Mark May] word. Yet it's used often here.

Here's a simple thought. Just watch the Buckeyes win football games and worry less about what ANYBODY says about it...media or otherwise.
Yeah, that's why we make fun of bwi.

I haven't watched anything but games on espn since the Alamo Bowl, save a couple minutes here and there. What's really annoying is that people still act like espn is all about "just the facts". They're nothing more than a hype machine to promote their interests. It would be easy to ignore it if they didn't have as much influence as they do. I mean, if you don't want to acknowledge or discuss it, then feel free. I see plenty of posters here that could use some education, so I'll keep on keepin' on.
 
Upvote 0
I LOL at all the use of the word "narrative" on this board. Someone chided the dip[Mark May]s at BWI for using the same bull[Mark May] word. Yet it's used often here.

Here's a simple thought. Just watch the Buckeyes win football games and worry less about what ANYBODY says about it...media or otherwise.

It's a buzzword that is used frequently. I think the objection to it being used on BWI was due to the fact that it wasn't the media driving that story, there really were children raped in the Penn State showers.
 
Upvote 0
To convince people of anything, you tell them a story, or narrative. Facts are far less persuasive than a story to people. You create a narrative, and apply new or recent facts to support it. Once you sell someone on it, they will view everything through that lens unless something radical happens that contradicts a foundation of that narrative.

It's how Herbie says that for OSU to get national respect, they need to schedule better out of conference and beat the SEC in a bowl game. What team has been aggressive about scheduling big teams ooc for over a decade? What team beat Arkansas in the Sugar Bowl? Doesn't matter if it's not part of the narrative. New things have to happen to change a narrative, facts don't matter to people.

If you don't believe me, ask yourself, honestly, how flexible your political beliefs are.
 
Upvote 0
To convince people of anything, you tell them a story, or narrative. Facts are far less persuasive than a story to people. You create a narrative, and apply new or recent facts to support it. Once you sell someone on it, they will view everything through that lens unless something radical happens that contradicts a foundation of that narrative.

It's how Herbie says that for OSU to get national respect, they need to schedule better out of conference and beat the SEC in a bowl game. What team has been aggressive about scheduling big teams ooc for over a decade? What team beat Arkansas in the Sugar Bowl? Doesn't matter if it's not part of the narrative. New things have to happen to change a narrative, facts don't matter to people.

If you don't believe me, ask yourself, honestly, how flexible your political beliefs are.

Good old Herbie "Dead-end-street". Goes out of his way to dis his alma mater. Oh, yeah..........we have to get into the game to beat them, but I guess that's irrelevant. :no:

GO BUCKS!!!!!!!!!!! :urban2:
 
Upvote 0
Too bad we "didn't" beat (a very good) Arky team in the Sugar Bowl to help our case of doing well against the SEC lately. That game never happened right? Oh, throw in Oregon in the 2010 Rose Bowl. While that game will remain on the books it doesn't in the minds of pin heads.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top