Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Jaxbuck;976386; said:I have no problem giving the SEC the nod for depth the past couple of years as long as I'm conversing with someone who understands its a cyclical thing and the B10 is just as good year in and year out.
GeauxTigers99;976400; said:LOL.........well, you're in luck!!!
Once again, I agree. A little tough not to, when you look at the history of the Big Ten compared to the history of the SEC. The history of OSU, Penn State, and even thought you may hate to admit it, Michigan, is very, very impressive. I would be a fool to try and argue against your point.
Factor in Miami and Florida State of the ACC, Oklahoma and Texas of the Big 12, USC & well ok, just USC of the Pac-10 (sorry, I just can't give credit to a conference that doesn't play defense :) ) and I would definitely say that it's a "cyclical thing". There's going to Up and Down years for each conference, right now the SEC is up. It won't be that way forever, and for me, that's just another reason why I love college football so much.
daveeb;976741; said:Colin Cowherd is bashing on the SEC.
scooter1369;976751; said:It all comes down to who emails him the most this week and what regions his advertisers need more next week.
Jaxbuck;978774; said:So again, if this is the deepest conference in America, if the worst SEC team is better than the best teams from other conferences, if the depth of the SEC makes it impossible to go undefeated, why are they simply 5-5 vs other BCS schools this year?
MGoBlog said:What the hell is going on here?The events of the past few weeks have caused me to radically revalue the SEC. To wit: it sucks. (For the record, the Big Ten also sucks. The Pac-10 is where it's at this year.) When Mississippi State takes down two supposed contenders, your conference is not good. What real evidence do we have of the SEC dominance that braindead sportswriters and southern yokels proclaim every fall? A brief SEC OOC dossier:
GOOD
LSU crushes VT. Georgia handles Oklahoma State who, yes, lost to Troy but is rounding into a decent Big 12 team. Auburn beats another decent Big 12 team, Kansas State.
LOOKED GOOD BUT UH...
Kentucky beats Louisville. Congratulations. Get in line behind Syracuse.
BAD
Auburn loses to USF. Tennessee is crushed by Cal. Mississippi State, competitive in conference, is obliterated by WVU. South Carolina struggles with awful UNC team. 'Bama loses to thoroughly mediocre FSU.
IRRELEVANT
Ole Miss loses to Mizzou, but they've also lost to every SEC team they've played so no points off.
That is the entire listing of SEC games against BCS competition and it's mostly bad. Mississippi State sucks, sucks, sucks, sucks, sucks sucks, sucks and they've beaten Auburn and Kentucky. 3-2 in the SEC Tennessee was crushed by 2-3 in the Pac-10 Cal. 4-1 in the SEC 'Bama lost to 2-3 in the ACC Florida State. So the SEC can suck it.
Florida? Gone. South Carolina? Gone. Kentucky? Gone. None has proven anything except they're mediocre teams in a mediocre conference. LSU takes a hit from this re-evaluation and a two-week span in which schedule strength got pounded with the UK loss, the UF loss, the VT loss, and the back-to-back South Carolina losses.
Gatorubet;978782; said:I maintain that our bottom tier would be successful against your bottom tier. Our bottom tier SEC teams seem to regularly beat "top" SEC tier teams, and I think that this occurs so often by virtue of their squad's overall athleticism, in a manner different than - say - the Big 10, where it is rarer for your bottom dwellers to knock you top teams off.
Finally, I do not know anyone with a brain that would say our Miss State's would kill the Ohio States of the world. Simply nonsense Jax.
Gatorubet;921590; said:disappointment