The day before yesterday I couldn't play at all. Yesterday I could, but certain things weren't working right. I'm sure when I log in today I'll see a whole new set of conditions. It's unstable, which is why I'm flat-out telling people not to buy it right now.
I'm giving it a review score within a week of launch. I don't see that as being an unreasonable amount of time to play a game of this complexity before making a decision. If that's too long for you to wait, I am sorry, but I would rather be right than first, and I'd rather have a well-thought-out and measured review than a knee-jerk reaction to initially unstable servers. That's just how it's gonna be.
It is baffling to me that you think I'm treating EA with some level of preference at a time when a story calling this game unplayably broken and a disaster - written by me - is currently in one of the most prominent positions on the site. And at a time when I'm telling people they shouldn't buy it in a running review. If I were afraid of hurting EA's feelings, I wouldn't have done any of that. I am not attempting to help EA. I am attempting to give gamers an accurate picture of what they can expect if they decide to play SimCity in the future, and frankly I couldn't care less what EA thinks of that.