Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BrutusBobcat;1588649; said:Losing to THIS Michigan team and THIS Michigan coach would be the greatest disaster in the last century of The Game. Forget that. Lose the Rose or lose to Iowa and there's not 1/100th the shame that there would be in losing to scUM. The worse they are, the more the game matters.
NateG;1588638; said:I think you mean ASU. Plus wouldn't Oregon State then win the tie breaker due to beating 2 of the 3 like teams?
per the link provided by BB73
Arizona (beat Oregon State and Stanford, lost to Oregon and Washington)
methomps;1588748; said:Sorry, that should have been
Zona still wins the tiebreaker since the survive the 4-team tiebreaker (both Zona and Oregon State 2-1) and then win the head-to-head against Oregon State.
I agree, let's wait until we wrap it up before we start speculating. But it would be nice for Arizona to lose their first Rose Bowl.Jake;1589471; said:I know a lot of people want USC again but I wouldn't mind playing someone different, rather than USC 3 times in 16 months. Been there, done that.
I think the last time we played Stanford some guy named Elway was their QB. We beat Oregon in the 80s when I was a student - their QB was Bill Musgrave, now an OC in the NFL. Those were both regular season affairs. Our last Rose versus the Cardinal was 1971, we lost to Jim Plunkett, and we beat Oregon in 1958, so both would be "new" to many of us.
Arizona is the only P10 team yet to reach the Rose and with Stoops as their HC it would definitely be a big game in the Youngstown area.
The only team I care about being in the Rose is our Bucks. Two wins from Pasadena!
BrutusBobcat;1588649; said:Losing to THIS Michigan team and THIS Michigan coach would be the greatest disaster in the last century of The Game. Forget that. Lose the Rose or lose to Iowa and there's not 1/100th the shame that there would be in losing to scUM. The worse they are, the more the game matters.
God yes, they all hurt, but 1995 and '96 were soul crushing. Goddamn was I a miserable prick for weeks after those two games.lvbuckeye;1588666; said:it was the plan of John F Cooper from 1988 to 2000. 1993-98 hurt the worst.
Jagdaddy;1590011; said:1969. The tie in 1973. 1995. That is all. The 1995 game to me was Cooper's worst loss at Ohio State because that year OSU was finally back, and they pissed it away, and, IMO, put their psychological demons on steroids for the game in 1996 and 1997.
BrutusBobcat;1594909; said:Working through the various scenarios in the Pac-10 after tonight's games, here's what each of the four two loss or less contenders need:
Oregon - Just win, baby
Stanford - Beat Cal, then needs Arizona to beat Oregon, Oregon to beat Oregon State and USC or ASU to beat Arizona
Arizona - Just win, baby
Oregon State - Win out, plus any Arizona loss
The everyone-loses-three scenario:
USC beats Arizona and UCLA
Cal beats Stanford
Arizona beats Oregon
Oregon State beats Oregon
Oregon State loses to Washington State (highly unlikely)
That would leave Oregon, Arizona, Cal, Stanford, USC, and Oregon State in a six way tie with three conference losses each.
Scenarios based on the Arizona-Oregon outcome:
Oregon wins, then the Oregon State game is the P-10 title game
Arizona wins, then needs wins over ASU and USC to clinch; any loss makes the BCS bid between Stanford and Oregon State
Should be a fun couple of weeks. The tiebreakers are really interesting and complicated since the various top teams have beaten each other. Oregon is in great shape, but absolutely cannot afford a loss at Arizona.