Per the NFL/NFLPA drug policy that was in effect at the time he pissed hot, it should be 16. You're mixing up things that either are or are not spelled out within the NFL rules.
Upvote
0
-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter Thump
- Start date
Per the NFL/NFLPA drug policy that was in effect at the time he pissed hot, it should be 16. You're mixing up things that either are or are not spelled out within the NFL rules.
Sure thing dude. We both know why you want Gordon back and yes you are making excuses for him to get him back on the field sooner. Sorry you can't read your own posts I guess.
Upvote
0
I didn't say all Browns fans... No need to make this a "no true Scotsman" argument.
Did I get that right?
Yeah - I was just trying to draw a parallel I guess.
Upvote
0
tsteele316
Mr. Such and Such
Sure thing dude. We both know why you want Gordon back and yes you are making excuses for him to get him back on the field sooner. Sorry you can't read your own posts I guess.
I don't need to reread my posts I wrote them. I asked you for some sort of example and you provided nothing. You spouted off with your panties in a bunch and had no basis for it.
Upvote
0
tsteele316
Mr. Such and Such
No, it's quite simple, you either retroactively apply the new drug policy across the board or don't. Going halfsies makes no sense, especially since the last two times this same thing came up the NFL set several different application dates to avoid any situation similar to this.
Upvote
0
I agree. He should be suspended for the year per the NFL's drug policy that was in effect on the date he pissed hot. End of story. I don't know why you just proved my case, but thank you for doing so.
Upvote
0
Goddell has taken the one job that was easy to not screw up and screwed it up so badly he should have been gone a month ago or more.
Upvote
0
tsteele316
Mr. Such and Such
My case was never anything to the contrary, which is something that you've failed to grasp somehow. Maybe read more and troll less?I agree. He should be suspended for the year per the NFL's drug policy that was in effect on the date he pissed hot. End of story. I don't know why you just proved my case, but thank you for doing so.
Upvote
0
You've done nothing but point to other people's transgressions as a way to get Hash Gordon's suspension reduced. That's not my problem, nor is it trolling to point out the blatant homerism.
Upvote
0
