methomps
an imbecility, a stupidity without name
BB73;1708271; said:It's worth looking at this once again.
RR's response is tailored specifically because he can be terminated for the above reasons. He's trying to avoid being responsible for a major violation, any intentional violation, and any awareness of somebody on his staff committing a violation.
Thus, according to his response:
- He didn't know his QC coaches were attending 7-on-7s
- He told his QC coaches not to be coaching players, and if they did any of that it was on their own and without his knowledge
- He didn't know his administrative staff went over a year without giving the job descriptions of the QC's to the Office of Compliance
- He had a misunderstanding of any rules that he broke (thus, it wasn't intentional)
- He didn't know the CARA forms weren't submitted for over a year
It makes me wonder if he intentionally didn't have an e-mail account, in order to be able to deny knowledge of things and blame his administrative staff for failures.
Michigan is really doing themselves a disservice by carrying the water for Rrod. This has to be his response, but it doesn't have to be the university's response.
Upvote
0