• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Reds Tidbits (2011 Season)

Yes, I reiterate, the Reds bullpen is going to be very nasty this season. The starting rotation is going to be good as well. Keep the injury bug away and we'll be fine. Looking forward to this season.
 
Upvote 0
Opening Day just became a little easier. MLB.com reports that the Brewers' Zach Grienke fractured a rib in a pickup basketball game and is headed to the DL. He's projected to miss his first 2-3 starts of the regular season.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;1885882; said:
Opening Day just became a little easier. MLB.com reports that the Brewers' Zach Grienke fractured a rib in a pickup basketball game and is headed to the DL. He's projected to miss his first 2-3 starts of the regular season.


is Jonny singing?

Hate to see an injury, but I've got tickets to Opening Day for the first time and I'd like the best chance at a win. Go Reds.
 
Upvote 0
Reds are facing off against Aaron Harang - now in a Padres uniform. He cruised in the first inning, but the Reds have roughed him up in the second. Three singles, a three-run bomb by Hanigan and another single have staked the Reds to a 4-0 lead.

I'm a little sad about Harang - He was very good for a few years and the Reds couldn't put a good team around him. Now the Reds have the team, and he's washed up and too expensive to be able to stick around.

As I typed this, the Reds have two more singles and a double. The Padres finally got an out on a fielder's choice, but the Reds got another run to make it 5-0. In effect, Harang hasn't been able to get a guy out yet this inning, and this is essentially the Louisville Bats lineup plus Brandon Phillips out there.
 
Upvote 0
A good article about Scott Rolen's impact on the team's aggressive baserunning style:

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20110309/COL03/303090130/Doc-Need-ya-third-Brucie-Reds-mantra?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Reds

'Need ya on third, Brucie' has become Reds' mantra


GOODYEAR ? They were both on the disabled list, Rolen with a concussion, Bruce with a broken wrist. They spent the games on the bench, talking. Actually, Rolen talked. Bruce listened.

?He spent a lot of time picking my brain,?? Rolen says now.
At some point, the discussion turned to scoring runs. Lots of runs, the best way, which is not hitting home runs, but getting runners on third base with less than two outs. ?I came up in Philly. You?re on first, base hit to right, you?re on third,?? Rolen explained. ?That was just good National League baseball."

The Reds didn?t play that way. With Ken Griffey Jr. and Adam Dunn in the lineup, they played base-to-base baseball. They hit a bunch of mighty home runs, and always lost more than they won. ?First to third with less than two outs is a huge play,?? Rolen would say to Bruce. ?That turns everything around and all it is, is effort."

Starting late in ?09 and all last year, ?Need ya on third, Brucie?? morphed from a joke to a directive to a mantra. It didn?t matter who was on first; he was ?Brucie." If the Reds were in the field and an opposing base runner stopped at second, Joey Votto might yell across the diamond to Rolen, ?Need ya on third, Brucie."

The Reds gospel of aggressive base running went national at the All Star Game, when Rolen made like Brucie to start a rally. In the NL dugout, a mic-ed Brandon Phillips said, ?That?s how we do it in Cincinnati!??

CONT...
 
Upvote 0
OK, its starting to feel real now. You know baseball isn't far away when you get the first "I'm a complete fucking moron" confirmation from teh Dusty.

The notion that Stubbs is better suited hitting down in the order, where he can use his power to drive in runs, evidently doesn?t count for as much. I don?t want Drew Stubbs bunting or looking for walks. I want him pounding balls into the gaps, when he can really use his speed.

Baker doesn?t quite agree. ?If I bat him two in the order, he can?t run and he?s my fastest runner,?? Baker says. ?Say I bat him seventh and he steals, they?re going to walk (the eighth batter) to get to the pitcher.?? Still, Baker admits, ?There?s no perfect solution. Most of the time, it?s short dudes who can run.??
Headache inducing link

I just laugh anymore. What the hell else can you do? :lol:
 
Upvote 0
Jaxbuck;1887710; said:
I just laugh anymore. What the hell else can you do? :lol:

Haha exactly. I personally prefer Stubbs bat 1st or 2nd in the order to use his speed, and if nothing more to keep Bruce out of the leadoff spot. While you certainly can understand his logic about hitting him 7th and shutting down his running, Baker's comments about hitting him 2nd and not wanting him to bunt are borderline ridiculous. Stubbs last year was 30 for 36 in steal attempts, which is a better percentage then both Ichiro and Carl Crawford. If Baker bats him second there are a plethora of possibilities:

1). He steals the base clean, which, as mentioned, he did at a high percentage, and Votto(and hopefully Bruce behind him) bats with a RISP.
2). Stubbs doesnt run, but because he is such a threat for a SB, Votto sees less breaking balls and more fastballs.
3). Say Phillips, who is batting 1st, gets on base in front of Stubbs. There is virtually no way that we hit into a double play with Stubbs' speed, thus leaving a runner on in front of Votto(assuming there were less than 2 outs to begin with).
4).Stubbs gets thrown out stealing and Votto, the NL MVP still comes to the plate.

Baker's comments about bunting, likewise, make little sense. Stubbs puts tremendous pressure on the defense when he hits a grounder to SS. If he lays down even a decent bunt it will make for an extremely difficult play. Furthermore Stubbs' bunts can easily turn into a double or triple with his type of speed and with his aforementioned very good SB success rate.

Baker's close minded approach with regard to the lineup is baffling, not only in this situation, but in regard to other situations such as his decision not to platoon Lewis/Gomes and his contemplation of batting Bruce first in the lineup. His notion that leadoff hitters are usually short dudes who can run is likewise very old fashioned and close minded.
 
Upvote 0
Dont forget that Stubbs was also finding quite a bit of pop in his bat as the season went on. He finds the gap or the line and its easy extra bases. Say Phillips gets on ahead of him. Phillips isnt going to slow Stubbs down because he's fast as well. On a single, thats the 1st to 3rd scenario perfectly is it not? Then Votto is up with a runner on 3rd and a strong possibility of Stubbs stealing second. In that scenario Votto most likely gets walked but if Stubbs just gets the pitchers attention enough for Votto to do some work, thats all we can ask for.

I personally dont think we are far off but its up to Brandon to be the leadoff guy, imo and set the table. Either one of those guys needs to just go up and get it done.

Also, what happens when Lewis is in Left, doesnt he probably lead off?
 
Upvote 0
I'm not actually giving Dusty a hard time so much with his leadoff choice given this roster as much as I'm laughing at his thought process in general.

-Fastest runner has to leadoff (homage to baseclogging)
-Short dudes run faster

That kind of shit just kills me.

When he was still with the Cubs he gave us the gem about black dudes being built for the heat/sun or some such shit. I forget the exact babble but it was hilarious.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top