• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

RB Jaamal Berry (Transfer to Murray State)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
BuckeyeNation27;1487721; said:
as of 2:34 pm yesterday, HTM isn't fielding any questions regarding to the Lazear-Berry "comparison".
Click to expand...


I use that same tactic when my wife has me dead to rights.

Just shut up and wait for something else to come up to distract her. If I said something real (as opposed to just normally) dumb I bribe my son with a transformer to go break something so she'll get off my ass and focus on him for a while.
 
Upvote 0
Jaxbuck;1487725; said:
I use that same tactic when my wife has me dead to rights.

Just shut up and wait for something else to come up to distract her. If I said something real (as opposed to just normally) dumb I bribe my son with a transformer to go break something so she'll get off my ass and focus on him for a while.
Click to expand...


Try sugar; it is harder to prove and a to prove than a toy, which in and of itself, represents physical evidence of an implicit contract. Even if hyperactivity is a possibly there is enough uncertainty in the medical community to provide plausible denyability.
 
Upvote 0
smithlabs;1487729; said:
Try sugar; it is harder to prove and a to prove than a toy, which in and of itself, represents physical evidence of an implicit contract. Even if hyperactivity is a possibly there is enough uncertainty in the medical community to provide plausible denyability.
Click to expand...


I'll deal with the old lady a million times before I'll voluntarily endure a couple of hours of my son on a sugar rush.

Now, supplying said sugar on my way out the door to go play golf has some merit. :sneaky:
 
Upvote 0
Bleed S & G;1487811; said:
The guys on the radio are crazy with this.. one question though, can anyone confirm or deny 97.1 reports that his myspace page was loaded with pictures of money and guns? DrewZwick?
Click to expand...

Let's just leave the MySpace reporting to Hooley & Spiels and the rest of the ESPN family.
 
Upvote 0
Jaxbuck;1487736; said:
I use that same tactic when my wife has me dead to rights.

Just shut up and wait for something else to come up to distract her.


I'll deal with the old lady a million times before I'll voluntarily endure a couple of hours of my son on a sugar rush.

Now, supplying said sugar on my way out the door to go play golf has some merit. :sneaky:
Click to expand...

I still think sugar has some merit why "wife has me dead to rights" and you "wait for something else to come up and distract her". The question is in the dosage. I think you can optimize the dosage with multiple experiments conducted on the way to play golf.
 
Upvote 0
smithlabs;1487840; said:
I still think sugar has some merit why "wife has me dead to rights" and you "wait for something else to come up and distract her". The question is in the dosage. I think you can optimize the dosage with multiple experiments conducted on the way to play golf.
Click to expand...


There would certainly be a large enough sample size to validate the findings if I decided to undertake that study.
 
Upvote 0
Bleed S & G;1487811; said:
The guys on the radio are crazy with this.. one question though, can anyone confirm or deny 97.1 reports that his myspace page was loaded with pictures of money and guns? DrewZwick?
Click to expand...

For those that don't know, those images were from a video game. Harmless stuff being blown out of proportion by those craving readership and/or a listening audience.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;1487993; said:
For those that don't know, those images were from a video game. Harmless stuff being blown out of proportion by those craving readership and/or a listening audience.
Click to expand...

Just to add a little more detail, the only "gangsta" images on Jamal's page were from a very common game like this (if not this exactly):



I looked at Jamal's myspace page via a link in an article when the arrest story first broke. He had a banner on the sidebar showing what rank he was in the game. Any images of guns are animated. These types of profile flare are common among myspace members of all ages and backgrounds (note the #1 app claim). This has as much to do with Jamal being a thug as a "What Superhero Are You?" quiz has to do with me being Green Lantern. There were absolutely no pics of Jamal posing with guns, cash, etc. I'm suprised, and more than a little disappointed, that anyone presenting themself as a journalist would mention this without completely discrediting it's relevance. Anyone who is using this as an indication of Jamal's character should be ashamed of themselves. They are quite simply exploiting an 18 year old kid for their own notoriety. Completely inexcusable.
 
Upvote 0
generaladm;1488120; said:
Just to add a little more detail, the only "gangsta" images on Jamal's page were from a very common game like this (if not this exactly):


I looked at Jamal's myspace page via a link in an article when the arrest story first broke. He had a banner on the sidebar showing what rank he was in the game. Any images of guns are animated. These types of profile flare are common among myspace members of all ages and backgrounds (note the #1 app claim). This has as much to do with Jamal being a thug as a "What Superhero Are You?" quiz has to do with me being Green Lantern. There were absolutely no pics of Jamal posing with guns, cash, etc. I'm suprised, and more than a little disappointed, that anyone presenting themself as a journalist would mention this without completely discrediting it's relevance. Anyone who is using this as an indication of Jamal's character should be ashamed of themselves. They are quite simply exploiting an 18 year old kid for their own notoriety. Completely inexcusable.
Click to expand...

Well said, but calling these talking heads "journalists" is a mistake.

Attention whores? Yes.

Journalists? Hell no.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top