Maybe it's just me, but most Qb's don't have all the tools. Certainly, they are good to great at one thing (running or pocket passing), and more than likely to be 'decent' at the other. At the elite D-1 level, I'm sure that the coaches are trying to work on the weaker of the two skills. Plus add in 'good decision making' skills (the difference between a great HSer and a great college QB?).
Braxton clearly has the running part down cold. Against Miami, he threw some 'wounded ducks', especially when he was running play action. That has gotten better (as I seem to remember the games since then), as has his touch (not perfect yet, but a darn sight better than it was).
Against UAB, it appeared to me that Urb was having him stay in the pocket and spread it around. OK, that was less than successful, but part of Braxton's maturation process. When he reverted to his more natural style, the O moved. I also suspect that going against one's own D in practice (with red/black jersy and all), is good, but inherently one knows they are going to pull up, instead of trying to take your head off.
Michigan State has the best D Braxton has faced this year (tOSU D excluded), and I'm not certain that he will be up to the task. I'm hoping, of course, and will be rooting for him, but every step is a learning process, and final exams are next year's (2013) edition. We all have to remember this isn't Woody or Tressel's system, but Urban's and his alone. Many of the elements are similar, but waaay different. Braxton has done very well, especially looking at the results he has shown to get to 4-0. And just to spice things up, how many of us arm-chair-QB's believe that Urb has shown all his cards?
Methinks that he's got a few new cards up his sleeve for MSU, (when wins count), versus the 'body-bag games' that tOSU has been playing.
:gobucks3::gobucks4:
Every day and every way......