This is my favorite reply post I have ever seen you make. One, great point. Two, I like the number of words. Lol.
Tate is listed at 5'11". I was too in HS. I was actually 5'9 3/4" without shoes and without craning my neck. There's a lot of lying about heights and weights in HS football. But Tate has gone to combines, and because they exist to serve college recruiters, maybe Tate really is 5'11". Regardless, seeing the field at just shy of 5'10" isn't all that different than seeing it at 5'11". I'd guess the average height of defensive linemen is around 6'4" in FBS. It's a problem. I played QB 2 years in HS. We ran the wishbone, but almost everything we did in the passing game was some form of sprint roll out left or right, and my number one option was to run it - which I usually did. I had one pass where I rose up from center to throw a slant to the WR or a banana route to the TE, and the OL basically hit the DL's in the gut on the side of the play to keep their hands down. I wasn't very good and we probably threw 5-10 times a game.
Anyway, shorter QBs have done very well in college in the right system. They haven't done as well in the pros, Brees and a few others aside. I don't care about pro football a lick, but I think it's hard to deny that 6'3-5" isn't ideal when you look at the QBs who were great college and pro players: your Mannings, Marinos, Bradys, Rodgers, etc. A little guy has to make up for the limitations with his height by making plays with his feet, and just being a playmaker in general (ala Manziel).
So, Tate has some things working against him, but he obviously has some high level talent. The question will be are his talent and abilities a good fit with what he will be asked to do at Ohio State and in the context of the competition he will be facing.