• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Purdue Boilermakers (official thread)

Brock Spack is ready to return.

This seems like about the best fit IMO. Purdue grad, has returned for a couple stints as an assistant, interviewed for the job in 2009 and has compiled some wins as a HC at Illinois State. And yep, that mustache:

headshot_1_FB_Coaches__12.JPG
 
Upvote 0
This seems like about the best fit IMO. Purdue grad, has returned for a couple stints as an assistant, interviewed for the job in 2009 and has compiled some wins as a HC at Illinois State. And yep, that mustache:

headshot_1_FB_Coaches__12.JPG
Friend of mine recently played for him as a Redbird. Maybe not a big "name" but this is Purdue. He could recruit Indiana and Illinois and maybe a little of Ohio and get back to Hope levels.
 
Upvote 0
It's oddly inter

Tiller won so someone else could. But I wouldn't recommend holding your breath either.

without question there are coaches with the ability to recruit and develop talent who "could" win there. but why on earth would anyone with that kind of ability "go there"??? seems to me there are much better openings with considerably better facilities/location/support/recruiting base/PAY, but thats just me...
 
Upvote 0
Art Briles acknowledges role in Baylor scandal
"There were some bad things that happened under my watch," Briles said. "And for that, I'm sorry. ... I was wrong. I'm sorry. I'm going to learn. I'm going to get better."
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/art-briles-acknowledges-role-baylor-scandal/story?id=41996649

Just sayin': If Purdue wants their best chance to actually win something, they could take the "low road', accept Art Briles' apology, give him a 2nd chance, and hire him. There may be some backlash, he is "damaged goods"; however, he is probably the best coach out there (maybe the only one with a winning record at a power 5 conference school*) that would actually accept the Purdue job.
*I doubt that Lane Kiffin would accept the Purdue job.
 
Upvote 0
Art Briles acknowledges role in Baylor scandal
"There were some bad things that happened under my watch," Briles said. "And for that, I'm sorry. ... I was wrong. I'm sorry. I'm going to learn. I'm going to get better."
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/art-briles-acknowledges-role-baylor-scandal/story?id=41996649

Just sayin': If Purdue wants their best chance to actually win something, they could take the "low road', accept Art Briles' apology, give him a 2nd chance, and hire him. There may be some backlash, he is "damaged goods"; however, he is probably the best coach out there (maybe the only one with a winning record at a power 5 conference school*) that would actually accept the Purdue job.
*I doubt that Lane Kiffin would accept the Purdue job.

Don't we already have enough contamination in the B1G with the Pedsters (not to mention MSU's percolatinging gymnastics doctor scandal)?

The thought of adding Briles to that mix makes me queasy (and I haven't had my morning coffee yet).
 
Upvote 0
Art Briles acknowledges role in Baylor scandal
"There were some bad things that happened under my watch," Briles said. "And for that, I'm sorry. ... I was wrong. I'm sorry. I'm going to learn. I'm going to get better."
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/art-briles-acknowledges-role-baylor-scandal/story?id=41996649

Just sayin': If Purdue wants their best chance to actually win something, they could take the "low road', accept Art Briles' apology, give him a 2nd chance, and hire him. There may be some backlash, he is "damaged goods"; however, he is probably the best coach out there (maybe the only one with a winning record at a power 5 conference school*) that would actually accept the Purdue job.
*I doubt that Lane Kiffin would accept the Purdue job.
He's be a great fit to replace Tuberville at Cincinnati. They like "troubled" coaches and damaged goods.
 
Upvote 0
aaaaiiieeee that would be sad if Purdue brought him in. I am rooting for Les or Bo.....

Don't we already have enough contamination in the B1G with the Pedsters (not to mention MSU's percolatinging gymnastics doctor scandal)?

The thought of adding Briles to that mix makes me queasy (and I haven't had my morning coffee yet).

Just sayin': There is CONTAMINATION and contamination. The Pedster's CONTAMINATION involves nobody admitting to any wrong doing, no acceptance of guilt, no remorse on anyone's part, and continuous lawsuits, etc. Briles has admitted to the wrong doing, accepted responsibility for his actions, shown remorse, issued what appears to be a sincere apology, and accepted his punishment (i.e. job termination). America is a country of giving second chances, just maybe Briles should be given a 2nd chance here.
 
Upvote 0
Just sayin': There is CONTAMINATION and contamination. The Pedster's CONTAMINATION involves nobody admitting to any wrong doing, no acceptance of guilt, no remorse on anyone's part, and continuous lawsuits, etc. Briles has admitted to the wrong doing, accepted responsibility for his actions, shown remorse, issued what appears to be a sincere apology, and accepted his punishment (i.e. job termination). America is a country of giving second chances, just maybe Briles should be given a 2nd chance here.

File under: We'll have to agree to disagree.

Pretty sure the multiple survivors of rape by his players would happily trade their recurring nightmares for whatever troubles Briles' sleep. Too bad a neatly-worded apology can't rectify that.

I've seen that second chances line used any number of times before, and given the kind of people it is frequently applied to, it always sounds to me more like a justification for looking the other way, or for not having the ethical backbone to hold someone accountable for their actions. It also tends to strike me as rooted in a Pollyanna view of human nature--an ingenuous belief that leopards can change their spots at will, or perhaps more accurately, that they can change their spots due to wishful thinking on the part of the observer.

As far as I know, the exact amount of money Briles' extorted from Baylor with his lawsuit and his threatened support of rape victim Jasmin Hernandez has never been disclosed, but they started bidding at $40 million. By the standards of every working person in the world, he did not pay a financial penalty for his negligence, rather, he was extravagantly rewarded for it.

As to the depth of Briles' remorse (difficult for me to gauge, given it only surfaced post national exposure) it seems to be measurable in the distance between his outstretched hand and Baylor's wallets. In the case of Hernandez, you may recall, Briles had simultaneously pursued his settlement with Baylor and promised to attend a mediation session on behalf of Hernandez...right up until Art got his money. *Poof* Art's a no-show.

Funny thing about Briles' particular breed of leopard: they are always monumentally satisfied with the state of their spots, and indifferent to their adverse affect on other living creatures, right up until the moment that the spots become common knowledge in whatever jungle they prowl. THEN, and only then, do they display any regret. One might expect a decent beast would have enough character to address his unsightly spots without being compelled. With a sequence of events like Art's, it's hard for me to believe they're sorry about anything other than finally being noticed.

One additional note, that should have a familiar ring to it. In Briles' motion to dismiss Hernandez' Title IX lawsuit against him, there's this gem:

Hernandez’s lawsuit alleges Baylor officials knew of Elliott’s proclivity toward sexual violence and were indifferent and insensitive after she reported the sexual assault.

Briles’ response states it is established in Texas that, as a general rule, an individual has no legal duty to protect another individual from the criminal acts of a third person.

As long as a man does his legal duty, what more do you expect from him?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top