WyoBuckeye
All-American
Buckeye1;696752; said:It is silly then when a sports agent assisting these so call "communities" by offering the players' parents a house near the universities so they can attend their son's/daughter's game? How about the BP community help raise fund and buy TS a reliable vehicle? Where do you draw the line? I think this is a good rule to have so that those wealthier "communities" do not have potential influence over a recruit.
I can see rules not allowing the players to accept gifts, but their parent's too? Where does the line get drawn? What if the parent's neighbors gave them the money to go to the game as a Christmas present? Is that a violation? Because it seems to me that this was little more than that; a community trying to raise money for parents to go to the game. I understand the potential for abuse, but a program and its players should not be able to be penalized for things that happen outside of the program's control. You can hold an institution responsible for the conduct of players, but how can an instititution be held responsible for the conduct of the the player's family? Now is every gift, job, or good thing that happens to a player's family immediately suspect? A college has no ability or authority to control the actions of player's families, so why should they be held responsible for it? The NCAA rules go too far. They seem to have rules about stuff which a university has no ability to control. If I had the money myself, I would annonmously send a check to the Pittmans and the Wells. What would the NCAA do about that?
Upvote
0