• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Pew pew pew (I'm smarter than Kinch)

So, then, there were no mass killings in CapecTown then.

no idea but that isn't the point

you were trying to use that highly skewed "research" to back the argument of mass killings being a daily occurrence. Mass shootings like the one in Vegas are no where near a daily occurrence.

Now if anyone wants to make the statement that America has a drug epidemic and that, combined with the criminal activity it breeds, kills people at a horrifying rate then I think we are starting to look at the issue more intelligently.
 
Upvote 0
quite simply the higher our population grows the higher the number of terrible things we do to each other will be.
non-suicide gun-related deaths have been steadily declining over the last 40 years or so; however, the number of mass shootings and the resulting deaths have not. despite consistent population growth, we live in a continuously safer environment that is curiously punctuated by ever-increasing mass casualty events.
 
Upvote 0
quite simply the higher our population grows the higher the number of terrible things we do to each other will be.

Has that been true in other countries? Is it even "true" at all?

"The role of population density in the generation or suppression of crime has been the subject of debate for decades. The classic argument is that high density offers opportunities for property crimes, given that it is a surrogate for the distribution of private property, much of which offers attractive targets to thieves. On the other hand, densely populated areas offer natural surveillance that has the effect of inhibiting violent crimes in so far as witnesses are more abundant and events are more likely to be reported to police."
http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/harries.html
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
So, an emerging market is now the benchmark for what was once the richest country in the world and it's moral leader?
Just making the obvious counterpoint that it's bad all over, Steve. The center cannot hold, and all that.

But frankly (as an aside) I also think the whole "moral leader" stuff is a bit simplistic: what would the international view of America have been if it had always been an Information/Social Media Age? It was a great narrative for us, but what if everyone always knew everything like we all do now?
 
Upvote 0
Just making the obvious counterpoint that it's bad all over, Steve. The center cannot hold, and all that.

But frankly (as an aside) I also think the whole "moral leader" stuff is a bit simplistic: what would the international view of America have been if it had always been an Information/Social Media Age? It was a great narrative for us, but what if everyone always knew everything like we all do now?
The views of American people as they raided/pillaged Native American land...

Ok, I’ll show myself out.
 
Upvote 0
Has that been true in other countries? Is it even "true" at all?

I didnt say anything about population density... our media now brings every headline grabbing crime to our attention. Even if the per capita crime goes down, the sheer volume of people will inevitably lead to a higher total number of terrible crimes, and the 24 hours news cycle will shove every single one down our throats.

what population density does is ensures that when a truly sick or evil person does pop up, they have no shortage of targets even if they dont live in a new york or LA there is always a city nearby with plenty of easy targets.
 
Upvote 0
trying to pass off west Philly gang/drug shootings as part of some national epidemic of "mass shootings" is lazy analysis at best. It is completely disingenuous manipulation of some data points to fit an existing agenda if you ask me.

I've always had an issue with the definition of "mass shooting" being 4 plus the perp (although it seems like some stats might use 4 including the perp, because I've heard of family murder suicides included in that stat). A mass shooting to me is something more akin to the Vegas shooting, a truly massive event. I would personally set the threshold in double digits, likely counting wounded in some manner if the number killed didn't reach high enough but there were a high amount injured by bullets.

I'm all for working on gun control and improving mental health treatment (because keeping guns out of the wrong hands is always a good thing as long as it is done right, and the views and treatment of mental health in our society are clearly not sufficient or good), because they can unfortunately go hand in hand, but I also don't see this event and resulting outcry as the panic-worthy, immediate issue that many do. This isn't a normal occurrence, and I think separating them from truly ideologically motivated acts is important as well. We could never see an event like this again and yet the stats would barely change.
 
Upvote 0
Why would you choose to believe a cover up on this. It makes no sense.

Because there's a cover-up. They said he checked in on the 28th.



Edit: also because Vegas runs on tourism, and it would be really bad for business for the FBI/LVMPD to come out and say that there were suspects at large... Even though on Wednesday, Sheriff Lombardo pretty much came out and said that he had help.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Because there's a cover-up. They said he checked in on the 28th.



Edit: also because Vegas runs on tourism, and it would be really bad for business for the FBI/LVMPD to come out and say that there were suspects at large... Even though on Wednesday, Sheriff Lombardo pretty much came out and said that he had help.

1. that necessarily proves what exactly?

2. i don't see anything identifying mandalay bay on that screenshot.

3. you just posted a tweet from an ex-project veritas "journalist." you do know their history of selectively editing media to promote an altered version of the truth, don't you?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Back
Top