http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/c...-denies-sandusky-appeal-bid-article-1.1743386
Not enough alums on the Supreme Court apparently.
From the comments:
At worst, Sandusky had inappropriate relations with some teenagers. I'm not going to lose any sleep over that. When I was their age, I was the only virgin within three city blocks. If you toss and turn at night worrying about teenage boys getting a little whoopie, then I have no sympathy for you. There is no way you could be that sheltered. I'm just saying, if you're going to sit at your keyboard and tell me that you were an innocent, little puppy in Dora the Explorer PJs when you were a teenager, there is going to be a story in the newspaper soon of you being struck by lightning.
However, I am still convinced that the prosecution's case was based entirely on fabrication. I do not trust the big red-haired guy. Sandusky doesn't have the psychological profile of a predator.
You can always tell a predator. They have a sort of wolfish, hungry stare. It's pretty unmistakable. Sandusky doesn't seem to have that level of focus.
Sorry to pop your balloon, but this comes across to me as another media-driven scandal.
Gotta be a troll.
Right?
Upvote
0