ORD_Buckeye
Wrong glass, Sir.
NFBuck;2190687; said:The great joestown schism of 2012.
Can we get Muck to dip into his personal arsenal and start arming both sides?
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NFBuck;2190687; said:The great joestown schism of 2012.
NFBuck;2190699; said:
ORD_Buckeye;2190702; said:Can we get Muck to dip into his personal arsenal and start arming both sides?
With a sex shed in the woods.sepia5;2190718; said:Muck's a Swede now. Total pacifist.
Hey ORD,These clowns have barely been on double secret probation for two weeks, and they went out and threw a toga party.
Wormer is most definitely going to drop the big one.
Ryan36_1;2190544; said:Please please let this happen:
-NCAA grants appeal
-BOT has no grounds to take this to court since appeal was granted
-Emmert personally shows up in Happy Valley (think POTUS flying into Middle East warzone middle of the night, not announced until he has left type visit)
-He hands the BOT a four year death penalty sanction and says 'If this isn't approved by majority vote and accepted, than EVERYTHING is on the table as far as punishment after the NCAA, Dept. of Ed, FBI, IRS, DEA, CIA, B1G, Happy Valley Library Overdue Books Enforcement, etc complete their investigations.
Like a Boss
LightningRod;2190601; said:As we all know the new board members believe that the PSU acting president acted beyond his authority when entering into the consent decree with the NCAA. Assuming the new board members who are upset with the sanctions receive proper authority to challenge the NCAA, the beauty of the first argument in support of overturning the sanctions is the PSU acting president misrepresented his authority to the NCAA while acting on behalf of the member school during a NCAA compliance investigation. That argument will certainly amuse the NCAA leadership.
As you undoubtedly are aware, the NCAA Constitution contains principles regarding institutional control and responsibility, as well as ethical conduct. Specifically, under Article 2.1, "it is the responsibility of each member institution to control its intercollegiate athletics program in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Association. The institutions president or chancellor is responsible for the administration of all aspects of the athletics program...." Further, that "includes responsibility for the actions of its staff members and for the actions of any other individual or organization engaged in activities promoting the athletics interests of the institution." These principles of institutional control are further elaborated on in Articles 6.01.1 and 6.4 of the Constitution, and universities are often held accountable in our infractions process for failure to meet them. Under Article 2.4, the NCAA Constitution requires that "for intercollegiaate athletics to promote the character development of participants, to enhance the integrity of higher education and to promote civility in society, student-athletes, coaches, and all others associated with these athletics programs and events should adhere to such fundamental values as respect, fairness, civility, honesty and responsibility. These values should be manifest not only in athletics participation, but also in the broad spectrum of activities affecting the athletics program." These principles are bedrock to the foundation of intercollegiate athletics; and the memership of the Association has made clear through the enactment of relevant bylaws that they are expected to be respected and followed.
This is why the I.R.S. doesn't penalize murderers who pay their taxes.
buxfan4life;2190665; said:Those people are just crazy.
The NCAA is a membership institution; a club.
Penn State, one member of the club, has accepted a report that suggests a systematic failure (from the president down to the lowly, little, insignificant head football coach) where high ranking folks were aware of a potentially felonious situation that occurred in the football facilities. They also knew that there was an eye-witness to said situation. They did nothing with this information other than talk to each other about it. The conclusion of those who researched the situation said that the failure was due the "culture" and the brand that is Penn State Football. These conclusions were accepted by Penn State.
The NCAA asked Penn State straight up if they chose to accept the report as it is, and submit it in lieu of actual investigation by the NCAA. Penn State said yes.
Due to Penn State's acceptance of the sequence of events, at least 18 other members of that club that is the NCAA have said that Penn State should be banned from football activities for more than one year due to the "culture".
Emmert asks for, and receives from other members of the club, permission to skip the "due process" since Penn State wanted the NCAA to accept the findings in the Freeh Report in lieu of an actual investigation. He then administers punishment that would help the "culture" de-emphasize football, but still allow them to field a team. He decided to be nice and not kill the program even though other members asked for it.
Now a couple of idiots on their BOT who feel one man (who is obviously is so much greater than the university itself in their eyes) are trying to file a federal lawsuit that should be quickly thrown out of any court in this land.
Again, these people are crazy.